Search Results: metro guys

I always see liberal chicks defending metro sexual men so that gave me the impression that girls preference those type of men

Some guys act metro sexual because they think girls like it

I'm the type of guy who always go out clean-shaven and always have a perfume on his pocket, spraying himself once every hour and I spend some more time on my hairdo than the average guy (I have a really cool fringe, haha)

But on the other hand, I always wear hoodies and baggy pants with All-Stars, I give zero shits of current trends and I dislike elegant places because I find them way boring.

Personally, I'd consider me as a metro (it's not as bad as others make it appear to be), since I put an effort on my appearance, even if it's out-of-sync with current trends (maybe it would be "in" around mid-90s, but I've never seen anyone else resembling me lately, hahahaha)

Let me start by saying this gay dont have a look, the mist macho looking guy could be gay abd you woyld not even know that he was gay... same with the mist flambiyant guy he could be the most metro straight guy and yiu mistake him fir being gay. bottom line is Gay folk don't take offense when if you say you're heterosexual but liberals freak out accusing you of homophobia. Is it hon phobic to tell liberals your straight or heterosexual?

I'm trying to determine what look has more appeal to women. Let me explain two guys:

Elegant guy:
Looks good in a suit. Jeans are not his thing. Metro-sexual, maybe a mustache but certainly no beard , his moves are smooth, he talks smooth, there is a kind of a sensitivity to him.

Rugged looking guy:
Jeans are his thing, Suits don't look good on him, manly kind of rough looking, perhaps a 5 o'clock shadow, a certain toughness to him

Who would you choose if you had to choose one? And why? And why the other one not?