Search Results: women with implants

We are all well aware of the fact that there is a large industry dedicated to preserving and improving people's looks; and let's be honest here, most of their customers are women. This ranges from everyday modifications like makeup, lipsticks, nail polish, hair dye - to pieces of clothing like pushup bras, body shaping pants that make one's bottocks extra round or high heels that accentuate the female form - to more drastic changes, like slim pills, liposuction, cosmetic surgeries, implants, etc...

But one would struggle to find a legitimate industry that caters to men's needs in this aspect - there is no quick fix for male unattractiveness in most cases. The closest thing I can think of is maybe THIS "ingenious" invention:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ecS4WTPSyw
But let's be fair, the male "beauty industry" isn't exactly saturated.

Whenever men complain about not being attractive enough, the answer is the same - go to the gym, you lazy bum!
But anyone who has actually BEEN to the gym for a long time knows that the standards of how a male body looks like are so distorted that unless you have top 5% genetics, you won't EVER qualify as "hot".
"But I don't care about muscles, I don't even find bodybuilders attractive" - says the average female reader right about now.
And honestly, I don't want to take a stance on what I feel like women perceive to be attractive - the fact is that any man will tell you that they get more attention from women if they are more muscular and hunky. And anyone who has heard the phrase "but you are skinny!" from a woman - after talking about physical feats for example - knows what I am talking about.

Now, I will spare the details about how steroids work, but let's just say they DO work, and pretty much 99% of the misconceptions about them are just that.

My question is:
Knowing how being more muscular gives men status and admiration among men and women alike, COULD ANABOLIC STEROIDS BE CONSIDERED MALE BEAUTY PRODUCTS?

An artificial womb contains cells from the lining of the uterus and this is where the egg is implanted. It would have to successfully replicate many of the physiological features that occur naturally in pregnancy, particularly those provided by the placenta. These include the transfer of nutrients and oxygen to the foetus, and the excretion of waste products such as urea and carbon dioxide.

Pros:
- Will benefit women who have damaged wombs
- Equality for both sexes
- Women do not need to take maternity leave
- Deaths of premature infants could be drastically reduced
- Artificial womb may be safer than a 'normal' womb, ie the risks of diseases, accidents, drugs, alcohol, pollutants, inadequate nutrition, etc., would all be virtually eliminated
- Will benefit women who can't conceive
- If technology improves, will benefit same sex couples
- Could potentially end abortion debate, ie instead of terminating the pregnancy, the baby can be moved to the artificial womb and put up for adoption
- chances of babies being premature will also reduce drastically
- the cahnceof genetic disease will also decreases which also let older women to have babies and no need to worry about the greater chance of the baby having genetic disease

cons:
- It goes agsint the Abraham religions
- it is not natural
- it would be bit expensive
- a lot people say babiesmay will feel less attach to their mother but it didn't yet got proven if babies feel attach by either nuturing after birth or in the fetus.