Search Results: muscular or athletic

Girls do you prefer more of a Germanic or meditrian look?

Germanic : tend to be taller ( not all the time ) , light skin , lighter eyes (blue or green , sometime more brown ) lighter hair ( blonde , red, lighter brown ) build is often broad and muscular and athletic and tend to be light skin to tanned. Face structre is usually high cheekbones , strong jawline and bigger forehead ( larger skull ).









dark hair , olive skin , dark eyes, tend to be shorter and smaller. Face structre usually include a broad nose and normal size head.



M

Just wondering since I am a Mexican-American guy who never really grew up with people within my own ethnic group since I was born and raised in a Non-Hispanic neighborhood. I mean, I have my mom but I don't really talk to her that much. Anyways, I used to wrestle and play football in high school and now, I'm in college, studying while trying to build my body up a bit more. Nothing too extreme but still build large muscles all over my body. I also want to defeat the stereotype of all Mexican men being short and fat. I'm actually 6'3 and 220lbs (with a more athletic body physique than fat or muscular). Even though I never had a chance to talk to enough Mexican or Latina ladies in general throughout my life, I still love and prefer them. I just wonder if they love their fellow Latino men with body physiques like these pictures below.

I am a guy with muscular athletic build. So i have large biceps, 6 pack abs, strong pecks, strong back. But beyond that I am kind of dorky and feminine. I like sports but I also like to write poetry, read about government, and watch clothing fashion shows.

I don't want to appear like I'm too full of myself but I'm being as objective as possible.
I'm 5'11 (180cm), with athletic proportional body, though currently not extremely fit, meaning my muscles aren't so toned and may be a bit of belly fat (when I say little I mean it :D ), But I still do have nicely shaped legs and arms and chest, it's not like it's ugly or bad, not even average, it's definitely above average but also not very muscular or extremely nicely shaped, let's say, few levels below that, but still looking overall quite good. Also good looking face, I've heard compliments before, cute, hot, sexy etc.

So been dating this girl for a week we had few times very hot sex etc. and then we started talking about some topics and I don't know how and why I came up with this but I asked her if I'm sexually attractive for her?
Her answer - "A bit. Not that much.
After another 5 min of talking she is basically telling me that in order to find me sexually attractive, I need to have perfectly toned body (toned muscles, more biceps, triceps etc) and have to be one head taller than my current height of 5'11. Then and only then she will find me sexually attractive and hot. At my current state she does not find me hot nor sexually attractive, but she thinks I'm a good person (oh so generous, wow 10x :D )

And I started thinking, is it really those two things that makes a person looks so amazingly sexually attractive, isn't it a combination of behavior, appearance (which I do have) , how you carry yourself, how you talk to a girl etc.
So somehow she (my current girl) ignores all of these things and pin points that I need perfectly toned body and more height to become sexually attractive, otherwise I'm not sexually attractive. Which to me sounds harsh af! And also shallow af! What do you guys think?
Is her point of view way too narrow, simplistic and shallow or unless guys have perfectly toned body and lots of height they can't be sexually attractive?