Questions: Trending & News

The boy's family was visiting the zoo when the boy slipped away and entered the enclosure. The boy went under a rail, through wires and over a moat wall to get into the enclosure, according to the zoo. Footage shot by a witness shows the 17-year-old silverback Harambe dragging the child through the water as the clamor of the crowd grew louder.

Zookeepers shot the 450-pound gorilla with a rifle rather than tranquilizing him. Cincinnati Zoo Director Thane Maynard said he stands by the decision to kill Harambe in order to save the child. The child was taken to the hospital but has since been released.
Jack Hanna, the director of the Columbus Zoo, also says the Cincinnati Zoo made the right call by killing Harambe.
The host of "Jack Hanna's Into the Wild" tells WBNS-TV that he saw video of the gorilla jerking the boy through a shallow moat in the exhibit Saturday afternoon.
Hanna says the boy would have died if the gorilla wasn't killed.

Do do you agree with this? Do you think the boy would have died, or do you think there were other options to ensure that the gorilla wasn't harmed?

Should the family be held accountable for the loss of this gravely endangered Gorilla? The Zoo basically can flush 17 years of breeding down the toilet. They were also planning on breeding with Harambe, so now they have to wait another 17 to 18 years to do this. By then the last wild one could already be extinct. Of course I am glad that the kid is alright, but I am also extremely pissed and sad about the avoidable loss of a beautiful creature. There is a petition out there, to have the family criminally persecuted for neglect. I'm not sure how I feel about that though. Personally, I think they should rather cover some of the financial investment the Zoo had to raise Harambe, plus the costs they will have raising the next male. in my opinion, it was an accident yes, but an avoidable one. Yes, small children can disapear in a second, BUT knowing this, parents should be extra careful. Especially if the kid had announced that he wanted to get in there. A small child will not understand a "no honey you can't do that", well, a well raised kid should listen and follow instructions, but unfortunately a kid is a kid. He probably just saw Mowgli and thought he'd say Hi to the Ape. I don't know, but it is no excuse whatsoever. Then the mom came forward, telling the world "my child is fine, thank God" but not one freaking word of "sorry" for the Gorilla. like WTF Lady? Do you feel ANY sort of anything about this other than defending her parenting skills? No wonder people are very pissed. So, what do you guys think?

So this happened in a recent comic. There was even a flashback of his childhood about a woman trying to brainwash him to work for Hydra. They're pretty much trying to tell us that he's been a Hydra double agent since the start (from his first silver age appearance in the 60s). This is how it ended:



And this IS Steve Rodgers. It's not Sam Wilson, who was Cap for the last few years. It's also not Bucky. He's also not a clone or a decoy. The writer also revealed that he's not being controlled and he's not pretending.

Personally, I think it's a slap in the face to the creators. He was created by 2 Jewish people and his very first comic shows him punching Hitler in the face. This just goes against everything he ever stood for.