Polls: Trending & News

So someone posted a story to a Reddit community, here's some of it:

"During my shift last night, a group of four women in their late 20s came in. They were a pleasure to have as customers. They ordered four of our house cocktails to start with and then went over the menu for their entrees.

When I was on my way back to their booth with the drinks on a tray, I walked by the back side and overheard one of them talking about how she was 14 weeks along. When I rounded back, they were talking about the same topic and it was clear to me that she was pregnant. I figured her having one drink wasn't a big deal. They ordered their entrees and I went off to handle other tables. About five minutes later, they called me over again and asked for another round. At this point I started getting concerned, but I took the order and cheerfully said I'd be right back. This time, I went to the bartender, and asked him to make one of them a virgin cocktail. He was confused but since he's a good friend of mine, I told him to just trust me."

Anyways so eventually the customer found out and talked with the manager who ended up yelling at the server according to the story... "She also informed me that I could get the restaurant in serious trouble for discrimination, and upon examination of my state's laws, she is correct. "

So who's in the wrong? Ignore the law, personally who do you think is in the wrong?

President Donald Trump's administration plans to take away food stamps from 3 million.

The proposed rule comes at a time when overall enrollment is dropping in food stamps, formally known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. About 36 million people received food stamp benefits in April, down from 44 million the previous year. More families are moving off the benefit as the economy improves. (Yes, the US economy is, in fact, improving.)

The proposed rule would require people who receive welfare payments through the Temporary Assistance to Needy Families program to apply separately for the food-stamp program. Typically, a family of three must earn less than $2,252 per month, or about $27,000 per year, to qualify for food stamps, according to the USDA.

It'll further improve the US economy.

So why you good girls like bad guys, I've been asking this for a real long time, I've been a bad boy as you can see, so why don't you good girls fall in love with me?

At first, I always thought it confusing when women would complain about it. I was 12 or so and having never been complimented on my body or even had a guy interested in me, I was always so confused because they should be happy they were getting compliments. I mean, why would anyone every reject someone telling them what an amazing body they had? And then it happened to me. I was 13 and wearing a pair of shorts for the first time in a while (I had been struggling with my self esteem for a bit.) I was just walking along the road, going to hang out with my friend at the park and this man stopped and yelled at me. It wasn't some mild thing either - it was quite a bit of 'nice a**' among other various things. I didn't even get my period until I was almost 14, I still looked like I was 10 at this time and this man stopped to tell me how much he wanted to fu** me. I didn't even start crying until I walked back home, it hadn't seemed like a compliment and it was more like I was some object for him to thrust his sexual desires on. Being only 13, i must say that experience has never left my mind and while I've had others, that was the worst.

So in deeper explanation, do you think they justified to feel that way?


I've included a wiki screenshot but feel free to search your own.

Stephen Yaxley-Lennon is known as Tommy Robinson.

During the 2018 case at Leeds Crown Court, reporting restrictions had been put in place postponing the publication of any details until the end of a series of linked trials involving 29 defendants.

However, Robinson, 36, from Luton, broadcast footage from outside the court on 25 May 2018, while the jury in the second trial of the series was considering its verdict.

The video lasted an hour-and-a-half and was viewed online 250,000 times, after being live-streamed on Facebook.

In a written ruling, Dame Victoria Sharp said Robinson had claimed his intention in making the broadcast was to "denounce the media" for their behaviour.

But the judges found he had encouraged others "to harass a defendant by finding him, knocking on his door, following him, and watching him".

This created "a real risk that the course of justice would be seriously impeded", she said.