Questions

I just got it a couple weeks ago and I'm loving it.

Does a black hole compress energy into mass until the positive repulsive force between protons outweighs the force of gravity and causes the singularity to split releasing space, matter, and energy from the conversion back into energy?

Electromagnetic forces are stronger than gravity the closer they are together. Either the negative magnetic forces of dark energy or the positive magnetic forces of protons will build endlessly in a black hole until it becomes unstable. This is in direct contradiction with the big freeze in terms of the universe having an end point instead of a cycle.

Would this then stipulate that black holes regularly explode and that only the Millky Way galaxy is 13 billion years old as the space in which it existed was compressed into the size of a golf ball before the explosion. With the mass of dark energy far exceeding the mass of conventional mass, will black holes always explode after the galaxy around them collapses?

If only the Millky Way galaxy is 13 billion years old can this then account for stars in other galaxies appearing to be older than 13 billion years old? The starts at the edge of the viewable universe appear to pre date the universe all together. I've read Steven Hawkins book on the origin of the universe and at no point are these aspects explained.

What do you think? Do black holes make mass from energy until they explode from positive repulsive force from protons, do they draw in negatively particles until the negative magnetic forces cause them to explode, or do you believe in the big freeze? I believe they make mass and it can be proved with a mathematical proof.

I have no means at which to prove my theory on the expansion of the universe as the math to prove it takes longer than the length of the universe to write itself. My theory is that the magnetic field between atoms are responsible for the Higgs field and there is nothing in the atom holding it together, but actually the weight of the entire universe holds them together. It also dictates the states of matter. Solid, when the magnetic attraction between the nuclei and the electron field of the atom next to it are stronger than the repulsive force between the two electron fields. Liquid, when the magnetic attraction between the nuclei and the electron field of the atom next to it are in equilibrium with the repulsive force between the two electron fields. Gas, when the magnetic attraction between the nuclei and the electron field of the atom next to it is weaker than the repulsive force between the two electron fields. Also all atoms become electro negative when heated. This is easily displayed by the formation of tricalcium silicate over dicalcium silicate in the chemical formation of portland for concrete. An elaboration of this theory would indicate that instead of a bar magnetic sending electrons back in time and them existing in two places at once in the dual split experiment, these instead are occurring constructive interference with one another. I would really like to prove my theory but sadly my python skills and access to a super computer are limited. I have the theory notarized from 2012. Should I go to the local college and ask for help or just keep passing it out until someone else knowing limit theorem plugs it into a computer to prove it for me?