Questions: Religion & Spirituality

It is strange to me that if you were to somehow see an atheist in a debate and they heard mention of a Satanist, they'd usually think of atheistic Satanists rather than theistic. I'm not sure if theists tend to view Satanists more of the theistic or atheistic type but by and large, I've never heard of an atheist who assumed a Satanist was of the theistic type.

Can anybody give any insight as to why this may be?

I think it has a lot to do with their incentives that they expect others to start off as atheistic in nature, then only apply theistic measures if there is more tell-tell signs coming in. That's my take on it.

When you hear of a Satanist, do you tend to think they are theistic or atheistic type or just generally don't make a decision?

As we know. With the advancements in sciences and the process of knowledge, sciences are maturing in the development of what's needed to verify or falsify something. As of date, they have currently not verified Heaven nor Hell nor have they falsified either (rules it out).

To falsify means you proved it is impossible and thus ruled it out.

To verify means you're proven it must be this way and a fact.

Explain why you think your answer is right.

I think physics is more likely to prove Hell exists than anything else due to the nature of Hell being just below the earth and many evidences is leading to suggest our last and final state of mind seems to be dark and troubled. Even people who have been clinically dead, not talking about near death, but actually brain dead, have shown signs of underworld experiences that correlates with what we know about Hell.

Tell me what you think.