Questions: Religion & Spirituality

This is for those to whom God has chosen to reveal Himself and His Son.

I plan to wait on having a relationship with a woman till the Lord returns and pairs me with my ideal partner.

Not only would we perfectly fit each other's preferences in both, personality and appearance, but we would also live in the Lord's Kingdom for eternity in a truly loving and loyal relationship.

Does anyone else plan to do this as well in regards to a relationship with a woman/man?

Holding off on relationships for the time being and waiting till He returns and gives you a mate who is absolutely perfect and who possesses everything you find attractive in every way?

Please explain which answer you picked as why it is the reason.

I think that this battle would be the ultimate battle as its consequences are of an eternal nature as God is also eternal. So the soul battle would be the greatest.

The reason I separated first 3 choices is to show which winner/draw would have even more of an impact to provide that it is even bigger.

I think if God wins the battle of the souls, it would be even more of a blow to Satan and his kingdom than it would be a blow against God and His kingdom if Satan wins the battle of souls.

If there are exactly 50% for each and they tie, then God and Satan played the ultimate battle to a draw. Imagine how uneasy and terrifying of work that would be to do this whole thing and it end without an ultimate winner.

Please give me your first thoughts, second thoughts and a brief summary as how this can be better campaigned. All answers are welcome.

If we can think our thoughts, that means that we have external free will in addition to internal free will. What we have control over that comes towards us can be thought but I don't think we can control our thoughts initially. I think we can entertain that thought or abandon that thought once it arises but not prevent it from coming. That is why so many Christians have thoughts that are evil but choose not to entertain that evil thought. But if they were to entertain that thought, then their actions or experience that evil thought into fruition, it would then be something they could have rejected.

If we are experiencing life as it happens but can't have an experience but are an experience of human life, then it belittles humans to say we are having an experience as if we had a choice to reject that experience. Anything that happens is an experience and experiences can not be destroyed. If our experience was to run track and field for 30 minutes, then had to cancel it and work out at the gym instead, then both experiences happened to us but how can we say that we controlled each as both of those experiences happened? If we chose something else, then our experiences would have been different. But if our experiences are what is happening, then what happens is already in the now as if with decision making.

Am I on the right track or am I am missing a few key points. Please help me. I am supposed to be having a conversation about this by Friday and need all the help I can get. I need to gain experience as a debater of the mind. I am inexperienced in certain aspects of philosophy but am excelling at certain other topics.

Also, give me your main reasoning why your choice was the one you chose.