Search Results: height preference

When I say preference I don't mean safety standards , which are standards you keep to protect you. E. g. not abusive etc.

Preference to me means something you would want but if everything else was right you could over look it.

For example, if a woman was kind, had a great personality, was fair and trustworthy, I feel people could overlook if see was a bit "large".

If a man ticked all the boxes but height, I feel people should over look it.

The comprises should mainly be on visual preferences. I do see women compromising but it often comes back to hurt them as they end up with an abusive partner.

This is why standards like not abusive and kind should be withstanded but preferences like height , weight and looks which don't themselves indicate a bad relationship should be a bit more flexible.

It seems to me that a lot of this dick insecurity stems from that fear that, once the relationship gets sexual, the guy may not fit the girl's preferences (or guy/guy, etc.) and may be uncomfortably big, small, thick or something. That'd be a hard thing to discover (ba dum tss) so far into a relationship.

As dicks aren't visible in profile pics, what if men just add the size information in the bio along with age, height, and other numbers that people think are important to mention?