Search Results: screen guys

Say pass a test of above 110 iq to qualify as a judge

i think they should have to so that judges become more rational, logical, reasonable, and fair... a lot of judges seem to be dumb.

for example... I was on a video about these guys called dentroptovsk maniacs or something (3guys that killed and murdered people with hammers and stuff and filmed it)
but one of them only filmed and didn’t participate in any of the murders... but he gets 9yrs for it?
that doesn’t seem right to me...

im not defending what they did, the guys who actually did the killings deserve to be tortured to hell and put in a brazen bull... but I put myself in cameraman’s shoes and feel abit bad he gets 9yrs jus for that... here’s my reasoning... there’s people online who watch real murder videos on shock sites out of morbid curiosity (whilst having no desire to commit the murders there self) but they jus enjoying watching it... well... what difference does it make if you’re watching the vid online behind a pc screen or in real life behind a camera? Why is the camera man treated any worse than online viewers who watch the vid?
the online viewers aren’t treated like criminals, they’re allowed to watch the vid... and like the online viewers... the camera man might have not had any intentions to ever kill either... he might not have even egged them along to do it... they probably was gonna do it without him if he didn’t film it anyway... so when they asked him if he wanted to come along n film... his morbid curiosity was probably like “yeah, why not jus go along to see n film it? They’re gonna do it anyway”

i dont think its fair he's gets 9yrs for that when online viewers get no time in prison for their morbid curiosity, but he does jus because he watched behind a camera screen instead of a pc screen? Wtf.. judges are dumb