Search Results: romantic gifts

suppose those sex robots will grow in demand (there are hundreds of interested customers already, most of which are men) will that make women a bit more competitive towards those machines?
for example what can the women do, that the sex robots can't, that makes them the better romantic and sexual companion? I know this question can be easily answered but the philosophy behind it is, that in some ways the sex robot can be the better choice depending on the woman (for instance a sex robot doesn't want our money, gifts, doesn't nag, doesn't get angry over stupid things, apologizes when it realized it was wrong, doesn't have anger issues and so on). And now I'm asking: could sex robots encourage women to compete with it and be making our women better? Or are women trembled by the rise of the ("SUPERIOR") sex robots so much?

keep in mind, that the more sex robots are sold, the lesser men are going to be available for women for dating. And women need men, right? Because we need women too but when we can't get what we need, we'll find other ways to deal with it, thus the sex robots. Some may keep the sex robot and still go on dating (in which case the sex robot serves as a therapy kind of thing).

I know that most people are on a spectrum, so let's imagine a scale. On one side of the scale is 0, or is completely logical and practical when expressing love and appreciation for your partner, and 100 is completely emotional, affectionate, passion-driven expression. Do you find yourself closer to 0 on the scale or 100?

I would classify practical/logical as not having to spend as much time with your partner, rarely verbalize or declare love, give more practical gifts rather than sentimental ones, sex is more based on pleasure rather than on the connective bond, prefers not to cuddle, rarely opens up kissing, rarely holds hands or touches partner, appreciates practical favors, intellectual discourse is more of a turn on than deep emotional conversation, more guarded with their emotions, more independent, etc.

And of course, affectionate and passionate people are the opposite; frequently declare and verbalize feelings, prefers romantic gestures, loves spontaneous sex, "makes love" more often than "fucks", loves to kiss/cuddle/hold/touch, sometimes may be seen as "clingy" to a very practical partner, more imaginative and creative in almost all aspects of the relationship (sex/love/dates/vacations), more codependent, etc.

I realize most people don't rest on 0 or 100 on this scale. If you could give yourself a number, where would you be? (I think I'd be a 75 or 80. I am an INFP-T by the way.)