Search Results: falsely accused

Not only that they play his victim to bully him while humiliating and leeching off him.

They threaten to falsely accuse their husbands to the world so that they submit to them.

I'll sum this up as easily as I can. Basically the idea of women falsely accusing men of wrong doing is more prominent thanks to the #metoo movement.

And while I don't deny most who got sacked deserved it, there seems to be this grey area where women seem to be encouraged to take unwanted sexual advances and pit them in the same category as attempted rape.

The idea that a woman can just suddenly take consent away, because she was wasted, had a shitty one night stand or was just ashamed of cheating on their SO.

If women were hoping to change mens behavior through fear of pain and accusations then it has backfired. Rather then dealing with nom committal consent, a lot of men have just decided to avoid romantic or sexual relationships altogether. Not out of any sort of hatred but because we just don't know what we would be dealing with.

Is she chill or is she uptight?
is she easily triggered or doesn't worry about trivial things?
Is she being open with me or am i being manipulated?

There's just no way to know for sure and so it's easier to not even bother.

So I wonder is this truly what women want?

Given the rise of radical feminism--how basically every major institution now seems to operate on the assumption of identity politics--and the fact that women more often cry rape than ever before (raping women is deplorable, women falsely accusing men of rape is equally deplorable), it seems self-evident that gender dynamics are quickly collapsing. At the current rate, a large segment of the male population will stop pursuing women altogether.

Now, I imagine this sounds like good news to many women, because as studies on Tinder have demonstrated, most women view 80% of men as unattractive and effectively undateable (source: http://worst-online-dater.tumblr.com/post/114619524524/tinder-experiments-ii-guys-unless-you-are). A lot of women would probably assume that if most men stop pursuing them, that must mean a lot of the undesirables bite the dust, leaving the ones they actually want much more easily detectable. Obviously, not all guys are going to walk away from women immediate, so they might be right. But, as more and more men realize what a raw deal they are getting, even these guys will opt-out of relationships as well and might eventually stop pursuing women altogether. Too many "straight, white males with lots of money and authority", am I right? So, why would a man with lots of potential settle down with or get involved with any one woman when he can lose everything he has worked for?

What do you think? Are we headed for a societal epidemic or is it just overblown hype and hysteria?

So yeah, I've recently finished this anime. First off, if you didn't watch it and you're planning on doing it, please don't cry about the spoilers that may or may not be in this question. It's inevitable. Anyways, I want your honest opinions. Who's vision of justice do you side more with? Light's idea of vigilantism and elimination of evildoers which results in the decrease of crime rates, or the police/L's lawful punishments towards criminals, even if the process is more inefficient? Personally, I side with L simply because of the innocent, falsely accused people that Light may have killed. If Light only killed criminals, I would actually agree with his view of justice. What do you think? Who's more right/fair, and why?