Search Results: hot kissing girls

I had a dream last night that a girl who looked around 14-16 years old wearing a skimpy dress was kissing me, rubbing her body against me, saying sexy things like "I'm the kind of girl you like best huh?". I touched her body and it was super warm, almost hot.

I do not have an obsession with underage girls and have certainly never made moves on one. I wasn't thinking about sex before bed either.

Am I morally accountable for having this dream?

So basically I just want a nice girlfriend, who:

- is beautiful (and I don't mean she has good looks, big boobs or is hot. Girls, who are kind are beautiful and attractive to me already. I even find older and intelligent, nice women attractive), kind
- is monogamous and doesn't cheat
- loves hugs and cuddles and kisses
- IS A SEX CRAZED NYMPH 😍 Seriously, a sex crazed nymph is just what I need. I would have sex all day long if I could. Friends with benefits wouldn't be the same because I want love too.
- is not a gold digger
- doesn't smoke

So yeah, basically a beautiful, kind and loving woman, who really loves sex and is faithful to her boyfriend.

Is that too much to expect from a woman or is that alright? Or are my expectations low?
And what do I need in order to be deserving of such a lady?

Title.

We as guys often refer to attractive girls by a number of different adjectives: Pretty; cute; hot; sexy; lovely; gorgeous, etc. My question to you is this-- what is the real difference between any of them? I often see girls on here asking odd questions such as "Hey guys which do you prefer, cute girls or sexy girls?" And my answer generally is, "Yes."

The reason-- for the decision to not entertain a choice between the two I mean-- is that *they're the same damn thing.* Either a girl is attractive enough that you would date her or want to kiss her or have sex with her, or she's not. Period. The rest is just splitting hairs in my opinion. If she's not attractive enough that you'd want to bang her, then how on earth is she "cute, but not hot?" Cute implies physical attraction at least on some level. So if she's not attractive enough to want to get with, why are you using any of those adjectives at all? Or, conversely, if she IS attractive enough, why not use any of them interchangeably?

I'm not suggesting that all attractive girls are EQUALLY attractive, I mean there's the 10 scale for a reason ("she's a 7/10" as opposed to "she's a 9/10" or whatever), but how does saying like "She'd be hotter if only blah blah blah" have any different meaning than "She'd be sexier if only blah blah blah."

No difference from what I can see. ^ The girl above is cute AND hot AND pretty AND sexy, not one or the other. Anyway, tell me. What do you guys think?