Search Results: short skirts

Personally, I like it. It makes sense to me, as they're called "shorts", not longs.

However, it shouldn't be treated as a requirement. There's nothing wrong with knee-length shorts as opposed to mid-thigh.

Basically, these shorter shorts for men are the male equivalent of mini skirts and dresses for women. Nothing wrong with them, and they look awesome on some people, but they're not for everyone.

I know this may sound like a sort of pervy question at first glance, but really, I'm just thinking of how uncomfortable it must be to keep legs crossed or close together at all times just so your underwear doesn't show.

Yes, I know wearing shorts underneath is an option, but by default, especially in hot and humid climates, I don't think women wear shorts under skirts and dresses. You can, but I believe just underwear is the default.

So do ladies find keeping their legs together like that comfortable? Or do they get used to it? Or do they stop caring? I'm curious.

modest, or whore, covered
or exposed, much material or less material?
why the one or the other?