Search Results: kick in the balls

I hear people advocate constantly about why men and women can not be equal. One of the arguments is the biological difference between the 2. I. E men are biologically stronger.

So on paper in a bout between the most physically fit man and woman, the man would generally win most of the time. Note I said on paper.

See there's this myth that men are just better then women at every sport, however there are 2 that I can Think of where women tend to beat men out that being long distance swimming and anything involving acrobatics.

To put it simply the most physically fit woman is generally lighter, more agile, nimble and flexible. Where as a man would be stronger physically but also heavier and much more stocky

So to put it simply the typically ideal physically fit man, is physically stronger but also heavier and thus much slower. Whereas the typically ideal physically fit female is lighter and physically weaker, but much more quicker and agile.

Now we return to the combat situation, assuming the girl can't slip out of the man's grasp all the dude has to do is pin her down and that's it game over, however the woman would likely go for critical points such as knee joints, or go for the neck or balls.

Is it a more difficult situation for the woman absolutely, but far from unwinnable. Keep in mind this is also a hypothetical between a man and woman at peak physical condition. In practice this is hardly the case as women kick men's ass in martial arts all the time.

So I say again, what matters is not the strength of ones arm, but the skill by which one hones it.

Do you agree?