Search Results: education degree

The job force and unemployment is low (A certain news channel says something else). We also want to close our border


thats all fine and dandy but who is gonna do these jobs. For the past 8 years, we been focused on Common Core, which is supposedly to give us the edge in learning, while again, the party to the Right is dumbing down the education system or eliminating it all because they dont want anyone to have advancement or education, and to be like them. Again, all fine and dandy to have skilled workers but you need others with advanced degrees. And by having skilled workers in the work force it is much beneficial.

Since there isn't any, we seek those from other countries who dont look like us, talk like us, act like us, or think like us and have a better work ethic than us. And yet, you want to close the borders.

With that said, and the options before you. If you had a Fortune 500 or Fortune 1000 company, you needed a skilled worker, who would you pick and why would you pick them.

Explain to me why you believe that, granted, you have someone in the country who is qualified, but, you will get someone from another country, who will accept less pay for more work they accomplish.

Was watching Michael Moore's documentary "Where to Invade Next" which has a long section on female leadership in other countries. It blamed men for the economic meltdown of 2008, pointing out that one European bank which didn't lose any money at all was managed totally by women. This, it says, shows that male leaders have too much testosterone leading them to do dumb and risky things.

I don't dispute these facts to a degree and would welcome a female president, provided she is the best PERSON for the job. But the way this film gushed over and focused only on women's good points -- how they see the world in a totally different and superior way -- seemed almost to deify them. Like if only men would step aside and women would take over, we'd have none of the problems we have today.


Wouldn't the world under female leadership still have problems? Already we can see that as women have asserted more influence, there's been a corresponding push toward free government-funded abortions, excessive political correctness, egregious violations of free speech, the assumption of guilt in any college rape accusation, an effort to eliminate risk in every sphere (to the point of dismantling "unsafe" playgrounds, banning the game of tag, Prohibition of alcohol in the 1920s, etc), the feminist/SJW culture of being offended by everything, and an education system tailored to girls' needs and learning style at the expense of boys. These are mostly bad things and I doubt they are coming from men. They may seem trivial compared to wars over oil but have the potential to produce a very oppressive society in the future where "wrong" ideas and thoughts are severely punished.

By this point, many countries have had female presidents, with mixed results, same as with male presidents. In fact the female presidents of Brazil and the Philippines only proved that female leaders can be just as corrupt as men. But what do you think? Would the world be better if women ruled it?