Search Results: in a position of power

I am a highly intelligent woman, though not a genius by any means. However, men my age tell me that intelligence is not a turn-on for them. They say that as long as a woman is "reasonably intelligent" that is what they need... This makes me think that I might be possibly too cerebral to attract men... I laugh but I'm not bubbly and I never dumb myself down for men.
Someone rightly pointed out that part of what put men off was my desire to correct things they said that were inaccurate or participate in verbal sparring (I appreciate a good debate). I've reigned that in with good results but I want a man who actually likes my intelligence.
Is this a matter of men liking different things? Does my intelligence make no difference at all? Or is it a matter of combining my intelligence with enough social leverage to not make it my main feature?
This isn't the first time this question has shown up in the comments of this blog - or in my e-mail. I have also discussed the topic at length with my sisters, their friends, and a couple of the girls I've dated. And judging from their absolute disbelief at what I've told them, there is some news to be shared here...

No woman wants to date a weak man. In fact, a man's attractiveness to women hinges on her perception of his personal strength. A man could manifest his strength in many ways: he could be financially powerful (rich), physically powerful (tall or strong), socially powerful (confident), intellectually powerful (smart or witty), morally powerful (good), politically powerful (highly positioned), etc.; but unless you respect and admire him for his strength, however it is manifested, you will not be attracted to him. Even the best-looking man in the world will be rejected by women once they realize he is weak.

Men know that their role in a relationship is to be the more powerful one, and to use their power to protect and provide for their woman and children. If you subscribe to evolutionary biology's take on history.

I think the powers that be have are the stage for European Union to take the economic "body shots". First Ireland then Greece. Italy and Spain are next. We are printing money at an insane rate to bank roll the plan. The Euro will take the big dive, not the Dollar. Dollar will recover as its position improves. Japan and few other countries are already getting into position. The spending spree is a gamble to insure a soften the of blow for the US. Germany and few others will take the brunt.

In 2007 we took the front end blow. Now it the EU's turn to digest to toxic fallouts. England, US and Israel will be the prime benefactors.

This why I believe the economic policies would remain eerily similar regardless of the elected officials political persuasion. All the rest is a political side show in an effort is to keep the masses busy insulting each other. When you are busy yelling you don't pay attention to what is going in around you. All the key economic policy making figures remains the same During the bush and Obama eras. There a few loose cannons that could derail the plan by creating too much fear. Ie N. Korea and Iran. Basically any country that doesn't play ball.

the crash of Euro will be damaging to the already slowing down economy of China. Another advantage for the US.

The is will come out ahead in this economic chess game of musical chairs.