Search Results: tan skin

So from my experience, depending on whether they take good care of their skin or not, darker girls have either overly rough skin or overly soft skin.

By "darker", I mean pretty much just any darker girl in general... from light brown tan olive skin some Latinas/Hispanic girls and Asian girls have, to dark brown skin lots of African girls have, just basically any darker skin in general.

When they just let their skin do it's own thing, and don't keep well-hydrated and such, it starts to go rather grey in some areas (referred to as "ashy"), and feels really rough. None of the white women I've been with ever had such rough skin.

But when do they have some sort of skincare routine and keep well-hydrated, their skin feels like heaven. It also looks really good. It looks perfectly brown, not ashy at all, and shines. None of the white women I've been with have ever had such soft skin.

Is it just coincidence, or is it REALLY a thing?

I'm 31, 5'8", mixed-race (Black/Indian), British, a graduate with a BA degree, slim, but still fit and athletic, and fairly well-endowed (though draw the line at providing penis measurements). I've also been told that I'm relatively handsome, with decently long hair (shoulder length), hazel eyes, and a fair/mildly tanned skin-tone. However, I'm still a virgin, with no prior relationship experience; I've never had even the slightest whiff of success in the field of dating. Probably the main reason for that is the fact that I'm technically an unemployed NEET, and still live with my parents. As someone who makes his money by trading in the stock market and commodities, I don't have a stable income; in essence, I'm effectively a professional gambler. And I work from my bedroom, so don't get out much either. I'm not autistic, but having been limited to speaking less than 200 words a day (to others- speaking to myself doesn't count) for several years now, my social skills and confidence have suffered to the extent where I might as well be. Not irreparably so though.

Instead, how much net income I manage to make in any given week, or month, fluctuates greatly; at the moment, this ranges from a minimum of around £500 ($650-750) in terrible months, to as much as £10,000 ($13,000-14,000) in an exceptionally good month. Even so, I've already paid off my student debts, and I've now started saving up in order to buy a house of my own, mortgage-free. And relocate to the Caribbean while I'm at it, since I already hold dual-nationality by birth, dislike life in the UK, and won't have to pay any more personal income, capital gains, inheritance nor gift taxes ever again. At this rate, I should realistically be able to accumulate enough funds to do so within the next year or two. So then, girls, knowing all of this about me, would any of you honestly consider me to be 'dateable' or not? And if not, then what makes me undateable?

So one day ago, me and my friend were having an argument about this woman's legs... I personally said they were amazing perfect legs. Silky smooth and spotless, even with a slight glow to them (in which is pretty rare to see in white girls, it's more common in black girls or olive skinned tan girls!)... thinner at the bottom but thicker at the thighs.

However, my friend said they're not bad, but just simply average legs, and that he's seen better. He said that the thickness contrast in between the calves and thighs is just a bit much, and that her legs are shorter than what he usually likes.

And so I just posted this post on here to see what people generally think of this specific woman's legs... also, don't worry about this woman's privacy. She's an internet model with several pictures similar to this one. But this is the one where she wears the shortest shorts of all, and gets into a position that really puts emphasis on her legs. It doesn't show her ass, but they're some really short shorts in which basically leave her whole legs, thighs and all bare.