Search Results: intercourse

"Consent must be explicit, implicit, complete, thorough, and informed. In addition to the implicit consent that is already exchanged between couples, you must explicitly ask your partner whether your partner wants to have sex with you. You must also give a complete and thorough summary of your sexual history. This is to help your partner to become aware of how many previous partners you've slept with and whether or not you've contracted STIs from those partners and whether or not you've been tested for any STIs. Finally, informed consent involves telling your partner exactly what is going to happen, which is sexual intercourse. You must be able to articulate that you are going to have sexual intercourse with your partner, how it is going to be achieved, what positions you are going to do, where you are going to do it, how long the sexual intercourse will take approximately, and that your partner can refuse participation in the act at any time at no penalty on your partner's part."

Would you ever entertain the notion of having a sexual relationship with a partner if he/she went through all this with you as a prelude to every single sexual encounter that you ever had with him/her, as the guidelines state that people now have to do, under the 'yes means yes' guidelines, or be found guilty of rape? If they sat you down, and gave a complete and thorough summary of every single sexual encounter they'd ever had in their life; before going on to tell you exactly what was going to happen in the forthcoming sex session, how they were going to go about having sex with you, which sexual positions they were going to do it in, exactly how long they'd have sex with you for, and clarifying that you could refuse to participate at any time in the explicitly detailed sexual activity they'd set out- in a cold, calm and emotionless manner, as the law states that all sexual partners must- how would you react? And would you ever have sex with them if they did this?