Search Results: dating a taller girl

Here's what I look like:





My body (before tanning, now I look better):

As you can see I am a really hot guy. The thing is that too many girls who are ugly or average believe they stand a chance with me even though this is obviously not true. Here are my dating standards:

Body:
-Must be thin but not too skinny. Bony or muscly is a dealbreaker.
-At least 5'4'' or taller. If she meets other standards I can overlook it though.
-At least B cups, perky boobs.
-Butt that is not too small and is perky.
-Perfect smooth pale skin. If she is overall good then I can consider a darker-skinned girl.
-Slim waist, wide hips. Hourglass shape.

As you can see, my standards regarding body are not that high. Most girls who take care of their body meet these standards.

Face:
-Good facial bones without any recessions.
-Almond shaped eyes with good under-eye support and not much upper eyelid exposure. Blue and green eyes are greatly preferred even though it's not a requirement.
-Perfect smooth pale skin, no acne. If she is overall good then I can consider a darker-skinned girl.
-Thick long hair, preferably blonde (not a requirement though).
-Small or medium straight nose.
-Forward maxilla, good jawline. Chin must not be too small, but not too big. Medium sized mandible.
-High prominent cheekbones.
-Feminine fat distribution. Buccal fat (chubby cheeks) are OK, but she needs to look really youthful and feminine. I don't require a modelesque face like mine, cute face is good.
-Plump feminine lips.

I don't think these standards are too high, but for some reason girls who are way below my league think they deserve a hot guy like me. I am not a hypocrite for having these standards because I meet the male analogue of them.

What do you think of these standards? Should I be more picky or is this enough?

I don't want to appear like I'm too full of myself but I'm being as objective as possible.
I'm 5'11 (180cm), with athletic proportional body, though currently not extremely fit, meaning my muscles aren't so toned and may be a bit of belly fat (when I say little I mean it :D ), But I still do have nicely shaped legs and arms and chest, it's not like it's ugly or bad, not even average, it's definitely above average but also not very muscular or extremely nicely shaped, let's say, few levels below that, but still looking overall quite good. Also good looking face, I've heard compliments before, cute, hot, sexy etc.

So been dating this girl for a week we had few times very hot sex etc. and then we started talking about some topics and I don't know how and why I came up with this but I asked her if I'm sexually attractive for her?
Her answer - "A bit. Not that much.
After another 5 min of talking she is basically telling me that in order to find me sexually attractive, I need to have perfectly toned body (toned muscles, more biceps, triceps etc) and have to be one head taller than my current height of 5'11. Then and only then she will find me sexually attractive and hot. At my current state she does not find me hot nor sexually attractive, but she thinks I'm a good person (oh so generous, wow 10x :D )

And I started thinking, is it really those two things that makes a person looks so amazingly sexually attractive, isn't it a combination of behavior, appearance (which I do have) , how you carry yourself, how you talk to a girl etc.
So somehow she (my current girl) ignores all of these things and pin points that I need perfectly toned body and more height to become sexually attractive, otherwise I'm not sexually attractive. Which to me sounds harsh af! And also shallow af! What do you guys think?
Is her point of view way too narrow, simplistic and shallow or unless guys have perfectly toned body and lots of height they can't be sexually attractive?

Why or why not?

Also, what would a man have to do in order to compensate for such a shortcoming? I am fit, well off, intelligent, a successful businessman, speak several languages, have made contributions to various scientific fields. I enjoy extreme sports (surfing, rock climbing, and skydiving). I do a lot of charity work both personally and with my company. I have many female friends, and when asked, none of them can tell me why women show absolutely zero interest in dating me and say any woman would be lucky to be with me. (However, none of them ever seem to know any single women to introduce me to, although i have known them to set up other male friends.) I have even been told I would be "the perfect guy" if only I were tall.

Much of my accomplishments I owe to my determination to find solutions to problems, and I really wish I could solve this most personal one of just not wanting to be alone in this world anymore.

Tall women constantly defend their preference for a taller man as necessary because they need a tall man to make them feel short. Simultaneously while proclaiming that they love their height. They laud height as a supremely masculine feature while turning a blind eye to the natural extension of their logic - that their bodies, as tall women, are also "masculine" in nature. Now I don't personally believe that masculininty or feminity is determined by the length of your limbs, but here's why this logic bothers me.

To maintain this dissonance without calling themselves "manly", tall women instead place the blame on short men. It is short men's fault that they feel like giants when they stand next to us. It is short men's height that is the problem. If we are strictly speaking by societal norms, then the short man's height is only half the problem. If the man is too short to be a man, then we could also say the woman is too tall to be a woman. If tall women can refuse to date us because we don't make them feel feminine, why aren't we allowed to place the blame on tall women for making us feel "un-masculine?"

The short answer is that it's not a viable option for the average man in today's dating market. However, this line of thinking is what leads to tall women believing that short men are incompatible and undesirable. Why are women who deviate outside of gender norms acceptable but the men who do so are shamed? Why are tall women's insecurities with their own bodies turned on its head and projected onto short men?