Search Results: need more affection

• Dogs can fucking kill if they're rabid.
• But cats will generally (ignoring the whole lion thing, of course there are some female lions out there!) just knock shit over and make a mess and, you know, at worst claw your eyes out.
• If a dog loves you, he will die for you or kill for you.
• Cats are more self-serving. When they love you, they will give you affection, but it will be purely on their terms.
• The threshold for cats to view you as enemies is much lower.
• You can do basically whatever you want to dogs. It takes a lot for a dog who has viewed you as a pack member to change that to an enemy.
• Cats are more vulnerable.
• Dogs are more durable.
• Cats have a sort of haughty air to them. This idea of "Women are the BEST!"
• Dogs are kinda dumb. They kinda just wander around and don't do much without a leader they respect.
• Cats are fairly self-reliant. They can be your friend or friends with other cats, and that's cool; or, they can be off on their own doing their own thing.
• Dogs NEED a pack and do not function well on their own. [This one kind of applies to both genders, and I'm not really sure if there is a gender difference at all here]
• Cats can be extremely sneaky and subtle and ninja-like.
• Dogs are fairly straightforward and obvious. There isn't much subtlety or ambiguity there. Enemy = bark. Friend = lick.

Naturally, all of these depend on your specific mix of feminine and masculine characteristics. For instance, I am more feminine-leaning than my girlfriend. However, I'm talking more about the feminine side vs the masculine side, rather than "ALL WOMEN ARE CATS", right. It just so happens that if we took all women and all men, the women's average would be closer to feminine, yeah? And the men's average would be closer to masculine, correct

So, I'm asking whether you think "most women" could be qualified as "like cats"; and, if whether you think "most men" could be qualified as dogs.