Questions: Society & Politics

If the Supreme Court is going to preserve automatic birthright citizenship, then the government should use every lawful tool available to prevent birth tourism. Denying visas when there is reason to believe someone is coming primarily to give birth is not sexism; it is immigration enforcement.

This policy would not be about punishing women for being pregnant. It would be about preventing people from using pregnancy as a pathway to secure automatic U. S. citizenship for a child. A sovereign country has the right to decide who enters and under what conditions.

- Gonna have to do it the hard way. issue no visas to pregnant women. if a woman has a child here she can never be considered for any kind of visa or green card for the rest of her life. no visas for family members of the child, ever. never allowed in the country again. -

Gonna have to do it the hard way. issue no visas to pregnant women. if a woman has a child here she can never be considered for any kind of visa or green card for the rest of her life. no visas for family members of the child, ever. never allowed in the country again. https://t.co/mDpFr9ivEx

— Phil Labonte 🇺🇸 (@philthatremains) June 30, 2026

Are you voting Republican to see this disaster continue?

Are you voting Democrat to stop the Lunatic with Dementia Trump?

Or will you vote Split ticket or for Independents?

Or will you not vote at all?

I am voting mostly Democrats for the first time ever. I don't plan to vote for Any Republicans unless they stood for America and rebuked Trump.

He lost is rape case , I mean sexual Assault, must Pay Carol woman $5 million

He must allow all mail ballots to count even late votes. That one stung him. He probably filled his diaper with that one. He hoped Republicans could hold enough seats from illegal redistricting and ballots not counted,

He can't replace Fed Board Gov , that exceeds his authority.

He can;t track Americans via cell phones without Cause.

Court didn't rule on birth right citizenship but they expected to rule against Trump on that too.

So were you surprised Court ruled against Trump? Will Trump use Postal Service to confiscate mail in ballots anyway?