Search Results: what are you thinking

Elon Musk: free-market capitalism, tech innovation, deregulation, SpaceX/Tesla/xAI outsider appeal, etc

Zohran Mamdani: democratic socialism, redistribution, tenant rights, public housing, working-class economic reform, etc

I would vote for Elon Musk because I trust a builder, innovator, and free-market capitalist far more than a democratic socialist.

Musk has actually created companies, jobs, technology, rockets, vehicles, infrastructure, and artificial intelligence platforms. He represents innovation, private enterprise, deregulation, and American technological strength.

Mamdani represents the opposite direction: redistribution, government expansion, rent control-style thinking, and democratic socialism. I do not want the country run by someone whose solution to every problem is more state control and more dependency.

So yes, between a flawed capitalist entrepreneur and a polished socialist politician, I would choose the capitalist builder every time.

She broke up with me for many reasons. Main reason I think is I didn’t make her feel special enough, she worried it could get messy. This girl was such a rare fine and too beautiful. I just can’t 😭. when we broke up I was hurt and told her not to contact me and unfollowed her off of instagram

I sent her a message 1.5 months after breakup a simple how are you etc.. she did ignore me

Message to send aswell as 100 roses 🥀

looking back on our relationship, I thought the connection we had was special and unique! The memories we made have stayed with me, I thought what we shared was genuinely meaningful. I do find myself thinking about you and wondering how you’re getting on, you meant a great deal to me and I still miss you much!

If you are open to it, I would really like to see you again and catch up it would be nice to hear from you 😊

I just finished a book and it got me thinking about this. What do you think?

Do you think people who support democratic socialism are usually thinking independently, or are they mainly influenced by ideological framing?

My answer is indoctrination.

That does not mean every supporter is stupid or incapable of thinking. It means democratic socialism is often presented through a very selective moral and economic framework.

People hear slogans like “tax the rich,” “free healthcare,” “free college,” and “healthcare is a human right,” but they are rarely forced to answer what happens after the slogan.

The Nordic model, for example, is not funded only by billionaires and corporations. Countries like Denmark and Sweden fund large welfare states through broad-based taxation, high consumer taxes like VAT, and heavy taxes on the middle class. That part is usually left out.

There is also opportunity cost. Money directed through government cannot also be used by families, businesses, churches, charities, investors, entrepreneurs, or local communities. Every government program consumes resources that could have been used elsewhere.

And then there are incentives. If you punish productivity, investment, risk-taking, and success too heavily, you eventually get less of those things.

My issue is that many people are taught capitalism’s failures while government failure is ignored. Markets can fail, yes. But bureaucracies fail too. Politicians have incentives. Agencies protect themselves. Programs grow beyond their original purpose.

So yes, I see support for democratic socialism as more indoctrination than independent economic reasoning—not because every supporter is unintelligent, but because the ideology is often taught with the costs, tradeoffs, and government failures conveniently minimized.