Questions: Religion & Spirituality

Other people doesn't seem to be the correct answer nor other creatures on Earth. Nobody can force people to hold a mindset but that doesn't mean all mindsets are attainable. There could exist a mindset possibility that hasn't been achieved or there could be a mindset concept in which reaching it is impossible but can be conceived.

There seems to be only 3 possibilities as to why 'atheists' are the way they are. They always fail to reason and scoff at the possibility that maybe they are that way because of Satan. They like to take sole credit of reaching it based on an intellectual process. Either God, Satan or the individual is the reason. Are there are other possibilities? Can you come up with an argument for each possibility as how it could be the correct answer?

Please share your views in who is most at fault! If multiple beings are the reason or fault, name the being who appears to be most at fault!

Name the top 3 theistic religions and the top 3 atheistic religions in terms of their adherents. I think Christianity, Islam and Buddhism are the top 3 theistic religions, although Christianity is more of a spiritually, since religion is works based and spirituality is grace based.

Yes, there is theistic Satanism and atheistic Satanism but what are the top 3 atheistic religions? Please share your views on each!

I am curious if you think the angels in Heaven are singing wondrous glories and praises unto God and if their singing is more Holy than that of a human's singing towards God. What are your thoughts?

Please explain why you think one does better than the other on average if we don't do an equally amazing or terrible job!

I personally think humans for no match against angels in singing.

It seems like we have the long needed driving force towards life that we've been looking for and it seems to be hands down that God was the driving force. Does this have plausible merits? If not, name at least 3 flaws in evolution driven life emergence.

If you don't think evolution was the driving force and that has plausible merits, name 3 flaws in God driven life emergence. This article goes deep into it.

Please share your best views!

https://www.BBC.co.uk/blogs/wondermonkey/2011/07/faith-versus-science-does-crea.shtml

We all hear in Luke 8 how God cast out demons from a man but why did he send them into the pigs rather than have no creature tortured?

What could a pig have done so vile that they deserved to be possessed of demons?

Do you think there was a sufficient reason? If you think demon possessed pigs could be good, please explain. If you think it is bad, explain how bad!

Please share your views about pigs being demon possessed. Also if you had a pig and he or she was verified to be demon possessed, how would you react?

https://www.oneplace.com/ministries/familylife-blended/listen/demon-possessed-pigs-luke-8-752525.html

Some Bible experts claim that we have solid grounds to rest assure that the rainbow never appeared until it rained and that reminder was that God would destroy the Earth with fire and not water. Do you think this has a shot at happening?

Please give your views about what rainbows remind us of and your overall views on if rainbows helps or hurts us spiritually!

I honestly think each of these 4 men could gives the likes of Sam Harris, Tom Jump, Aron Ra and Richard Dawkins a good run at their views and make them work hard to come up with a great defense.

What are your thoughts on the theistic vs atheistic debates? Are they meaningless to watch?

Please share which of these men would be toughest to defeat in a debate if you had to battle one of them!

I was wanting to know what your victory over death stance is. Did Jesus win the victory for our salvation or do you believe Satan actually defeated Jesus for the death battle.

Please share which level of evidence that you think we have concerning salvation through Jesus Christ!

Just so you know, evidence against is not same as no evidence for. We can have no evidence for and it doesn't make it evidence against. If we have evidence against, that is the stronger stance and thus no evidence for. So if F is true, G is too. However, G could be true without F being true. F could be true or false if G is true.