Questions: Religion & Spirituality

This of course is assuming that they don't want to change their ways.

How can you say murder and rape is evil if you can avoid its punishment and its punishment is only predicated on whether you get caught or not. Anything that is immoral would not be left up to human interpretation and would exist beyond human opinion and transcends what people have to say about it.

If you say rape is evil but there is a way in which it won't be punished like not having a system set up to punish those who partake in it, then it is not really immoral but rather an opinion of humans. Anything that has a determining factor by humans to decide what is right or wrong is just that: interpretation and does not dwell beyond the scope of humans. So if it does not transcend into eternal and always working, then it is just a gimmick trick to sometimes punish people and if it is only based on if you are caught or not, then it does not have external value in being moral or immoral or it will by default and definition always have a way of placing the action of immorality to its perfected outcome.

If things are immoral and it is possible to yield a less than immoral result in perfecting its punishment, then it is not good nor evil. There is no way you can defeat this argument and anything you say that immorality sometimes goes unpunished by a society, then I can tear that down by saying that people can decide and dictate any given set of actions and that action can go undetected as humans miss things. Therefore, it didn't go beyond the scope of humans to correctly dish out a deserved punishment. That means that if it had no external result to its action like things having outcomes for what it is and can be decided, then will was used in determining it and it really is not an immoral or moral basis in saying rape or murder is immoral.

You are immoral to call rape or murder immoral if it is possible to escape punishment for those who live in those sins or crimes.

Thanks, 1st round KO

No matter what the subject matter is that is about the Godhead, about the Mark of the Beast, angels or demons, the ones who claim to be atheists talk their opinions as if it is the greatest one available and all others are stupid.

You can have a discussion about why it is important not to blaspheme the Holy Ghost or why we should be saved and they will think whatever they had to say takes precedence over whatever any Christian or theologian has to say. They act as if they are experts in the topics.

Why do you think they do this?

What is the ultimate goal?