Polls: Religion & Spirituality

By spiritual music, I mean the good and the evil (Christian and Heavy Metal). If you listen to both, you are spiritually confused. Please list why if none of my choices apply in your situation.

I consider Satanic music to be far worse than plain secular music. Secular music promotes things like pleasures of the world, whereas Satanic music promotes all things evil and mockery of the Divine and mainly against Jesus.

It is amazing how they always target Christianity and it is because they hate God and know the true God is Jesus.

As I ask more questions, most of them will be from the Religion and Spirituality section but God and Satan can be in all aspects of life as food, travel, education, etc. It should not just strictly go into religion and spirituality.

Thanks for reading and share your top thoughts.

Think about it! If the universe is eternal, you are in essence believing God is the universe. The problem arises when something can not cause itself. The universe can't cause the universe to exist. If the universe is not eternal, something can't have a past infinite. So a first cause must be necessary, as nothing caused that. Therefore, God exists and created the universe.

Rejoice, 'atheists'! You can now celebrate knowing God exist whether you believe or not.

Something or someone eternal must be the first cause of everything and can't be caused by anything prior to itself/Himself/Herself. If it is eternal, it must be necessary since it was not random or caused to happen. The initial eternal thing can't not exist.

That proves we all know God exists whether we know it has causal agency or not. Something eternal can't be contingent upon other things nor have been a random process out of something.

Now we need to provide evidences within the next 10 years or so proving God must be an un-embodied mind and not just without causal agencies and I trust we will have that evidence soon.

Thanks for listening.

Before you think evil or scoff, I'm mature now and too mature in the last 4 days to resort to showcasing anger. This is for the reverence strong and not the spiritually weak. I expect those who mock to do so as they can't help themselves. I won't be harassing other users who block me again as I have embarked on my final battle and final account here.

Let's say you're in a situation where you have a theory, and for whatever reason that theory is that by killing this one innocent person, you can save 100 people. You could very well be wrong, and it could very well be the case that you will be the only one with blood on your hands and that no good will come from this deed, and no matter what analogy you use, this doubt will be ever present in at least some amount.

Will you take the first step with an immoral action thinking there will be a moral outcome?

I was speaking to a newly de-convert from theism and he now ascribes to atheism, which I don't accept, and said if God exists, then it would be immoral because He would be invading our minds, which he said should be private and that if God indeed did exist that He should judge us based on actions and not thoughts. He also said that God being all-powerful would be able to disconnect Himself from reaching our minds and only judging our actions.

I countered by saying that if God withdrew His knowledge of what were in our mind, then God wouldn't be all-knowing because if He withdrew that know of Himself from us, He would know that He didn't know what He was not allowing Himself to know about what we were thinking and that means He wouldn't be God. To be God, it is necessary that He knows what we think and can't withdrew freely from knowing what we think. If God withheld part of His knowledge, He can't be all-knowing.

God's existence can't be immoral regardless of the knowledge of our minds since existence is not something He brought Himself into having, as it is necessary for God to exist and if He had no say in His existence, then He didn't do an evil action by existing. If God's existence was not a willful act, He can't be held morally accountable for existing. Maybe He can have a point in the knowledge part but not the existence part.

he finally granted some premises and said regardless, if God exists, He should desire to let us know He exists so he said God either does not exist or doesn't want us to know He exists. God could have sufficient reasons for not wanting us to know He exists as some people can't handle God's existence. He later said after a few more argumentation points, that even if He exists, He will not serve God since God shouldn't be so selfish or jealous.

So what are your thoughts?

If you answer for multiple days, it is assumed it is not all days and between 2 and 6 days so keep that in mind. No sense to vote multiple days in you keep all days holy when option A covers all days.

Saturday is the Sabbath Day. If is not for debate if you think the Sabbath Day is another day. You have knowledge that I'm understanding Saturday as the Sabbath so if you see Sabbath, assume Saturday over your beliefs.

By keeping Holy, I mean do not work like a job or watch television or do other pleasure seeking things on that day.

If you used to but don't know, ignore that and vote in terms of your current situation.

Coexist means lives together at the same time period.

Tell me why you think your belief is the correct one.