Search Results: is he pretending to be gay

I'm 21 and I already feel like I'm from a different generation. Firstly, I'm a straight, white guy who feels like a straight white guy so maybe I'm never going to get a lot of this anyway but I'm really confused. Then I read this:

https://thedailyedge.thejournal.ie/ruby-rose-turn-gay-2167480-Jun2015/

Apparently, some women have joked that a woman on Orange is the New Black has made them think about 'turning gay' and some have found that offensive.

So women joking about turning gay is a step too far but pretending to be black and announcing that you're now a woman named Caitlyn Jenner after 65 years of being Bruce is great.

I actually understood the Jenner thing but I have now lost any kind of common ground with the people who think all this is ok. I've competely given up on understanding any of this apart from asking this question (which is more of a rant than a request for information).

Also, an extra question for those of who you've read this far:

As a straight white guy, should I avoid any converstaion about race, gender, sexuality etc. around anyone that isn't straight, white and male to avoid causing offence?

The poll just refers to the question title though.

hardly ever from gays and lesbians?

I often hear how men have this very big misconsception of Lesbians being "man-haters". If anything, as a straight man, I've actually got along with Lesbians more than any other sexual orientation and gender groups and dealt with more anti-male sentiments from straight women. Lesbians have no problem with men in general. They only have a problem with bigots, idiots and a few men who couldn't respect their sexual orientation.

I honestly think it's quite sad how based on my experience, straight men and straight women (even in relationships) don't get along so well while gays and lesbians do. Sometimes I feel that straight men and straight women only pretend to love each other in relationships for the sake of reproduction and society.

[link]

The activist group "United We Dream" is now up to something, according to LifeSiteNews, that is unprecedented. They are now saying that all illegals inside US prisons should be set free, regardless of whatever crimes they may have committed - provided they identify as some shade of LGBT.

Now, I know most have the false "equality" argument rammed down their throats, and must at least pretend to agree with it to graduate high school. But it would appear in this instance that UWD is no longer interested in "equality" by any definition of the word. They are now seeming to argue that gays should be above the law, period.

Worse... how do they verify that if one of those illegal aliens "identifies" as such so as to use it as a Get-Out-of-Jail-Free card, that they'll be required to demonstrate? Or that they'll continue to be such once they're free? And if they're bisexual, then how does letting them be above the law necessarily benefit anyone in the long run? How does it mean anything, when straight criminals don't get the same luxury?

And what if they're in because they robbed a bank? Or hacked a woman to smithereens with a chainsaw? There is no logical way to ensure such a "cleansing" could even happen, unless all illegals were allowed to roam free. Essentially, this would mean that invading the country must be rewarded rather than punished, consequences be damned.

In the good old days, that was called treason. Every single other nation on Earth (save for maybe Sweden) seems to agree with this old paradigm, including Mexico, a big offender in sending illegals to America.

So has UWD finally completely discredited itself? Seems to me, they're just using gullible gays to further a much more sinister end goal, one hardly related to LGBT in any way, (apart from the fact that both issues were once a big deal to the KGB.)