Search Results: dating a minor

It is mutual agreement between partners converted into a contract for the sake of relationship. Here are some conditions I found:

The Dating Contract
By signing this contract you agree to all of the following terms and conditions to dating this person as well as to stick by these until the relationship is over.
1. In no way, shape or form should you place consequences upon your partner for being friends with anyone unless they are a legitimate danger to either of you or your relationship or if the friend harasses either of you.
2. You will always trust your partner while in the relationship unless you have legitimate proof that they are cheating on you.
3. You will never make them choose between you and something else minor such as, but not limited to, hanging out with friends, a family activity, playing a sport or anything else that is not detrimental to your relationship.
4. You will never cheat on your partner.
5. You will love them more than anyone else that is not related to you.
6. You will let them have their time away from you when they want, within reason.
7. You will never say anything that will insult, hurt, anger, sadden or guilt them purposely.
8. You will respect their wishes and their space.
9. You will never do anything inappropriate that was not mutually decided upon previously and agreed upon by both.
10. You will never “enter” your partner without an “open boarders” agreement that has been decided upon by both partners previously. Nor can this agreement be forced upon one by anybody. You can find remaing conditions here


As this contract shall be based mutual agreement, terms mentioned here are just an example which you can change for your relationship

If it is legally bound, you can sue your partner for breaking it.

IF you had the opportunity to vote for Judge Roy Moore's Senate bid, how would you vote considering his accusations from over 30+ years ago [1977-1982] about his dating/sexual misconduct with minors (Ages 14-17yrs) while he was in his early 30's?

An advert for a dating site offering to help students in Paris find a "Sugar Daddy" to fund their studies has been removed by police. A mobile billboard was advertising the RichMeetBeautiful site in the grounds of Sorbonne University. It featured a couple cuddling with the message to students - "romance, passion and no student loan, go out with a Sugar Daddy or Sugar Mama".

Since then police have seized the billboard. A tweet from City of Paris official account said it "strongly condemned the shameful advertisement" and would "work with police to make it disappear from our streets". Deputy Mayor of Paris, Helene Bidard, claimed that the advert constituted a form of prostitution, and stated that "as well as the public order problems caused by an advert that can be seen by minors, this site is an offence against women." She later said an investigation had been opened on the website for pimping and police had seized the truck for displaying without authorization.

The site's founder, Norwegian Sigurd Vedal, said the site aims to put people in contact with each other, like any other dating site. He previously denied any similarity to prostitution when he was criticized for advertising in Brussels last month. "It's a classic misunderstanding. We are like a normal dating site, but financial is part of the checklist," he told a television station in Belgium. The French student association FAGE has also lodged a criminal complaint about pimping. What's your opinion of all this? Who's in the wrong here?