Search Results: rape victims

And more fulfilling and entertaining lives?

"Anything a man can do - women can do better".

"The future is female"

80% of suicide victims are male.

Women outnumber men in College.

Women aged 20-30 make much more than men the same age.

If a woman falls accidentally pregnant, it's no big deal for her. If a guy gets a girl pregnant, his life is ruined.

Girls are just more successful than guys, in younger generations. Not to mention the extreme hatred and "scape-goating" that is going on against men, especially white men. Women have the most doors open for them and have it easier than guys in almost every capacity. If a man is raped by a woman, and he asked for justice, he would be laughed at? Not fair. And domestic abuse is always favoring women when guys are abused even more. Sorry to get into a anti-feminism rant but what I said is all tue. I think it's clear women have better lives. I just wanna see what you think.

Oh and this is in general and it is also referring to women living in the developed world. Just to not cause any confusion.

I thought of this question after reflecting the #MeToo movement. I found a phrase, "believe all women", which to me seems to be an integral part of the #MeToo movement. A couple of people online even dubbed it the "believe all women movement".

I highly prefer more thorough opinions, but all are welcome!
What do you think?

This is a question inspired by a twitter poll i recently saw, so here is a bit of context.

Lets say there are three rapists accused, one is actually a rapist but two are innocent.
In these cases the girls are late to the party and can no longer create the proper evidence.

If you as the court decide to go based on the claims of the girls alone, you will catch a rapist and prevent him from doing harm however two other men will have there life's destroyed and get put in an environment full of criminals that since they are good man will get taken full advantage off in the prison system as they aren't used to fights or to defend themselves in a crowd. These guys will never get a job, get traumatized in the prison and will never be the same and there family will be without a father. However, the third rapist is caught and that means that you stopped him from creating more victims.

Or do you dismiss the cases based on the facts there is not enough evidence? The two man can use this to there peers to proof they are innocent, still have a bit of a stigma but since they are proven innocent they can rebuild there life's. But, the rapist is still around vulnerable girls and can take advantage off them at any moment creating new victims who may be to afraid to report and there for stop him.

Normally you wouldn't know how many are innocent, but this time its part of the question so you have a bit of an insight. You don't know who is innocent or who raped though, so the poll contains no options for further research as there is absolutely not enough evidence based on the case and even the lie detector tests where not consistent.

So Judge GAG, what is your ruling?

I’ve noticed a certain pattern when it comes to sexual harassment abusers. When women blame men for it they are immediately guilty until proven innocent and no amount of evidence stating otherwise is able to repair his reputation if he’s accused. Even if the woman is caught lying she walks off scot free.

But when a man accuses a woman of sexual harassment or even rape, the most she gets is a slap on the wrist. Sometimes they try to turn the tables and blame the victim.

It scares me that they have that kind of power and I’m worried that someday it can be used against me. What do you think?