Search Results: athletic body

I've been questioning this idea for a long time, since I was a teen.

I have proper muscular legs, but my body type revolves more around an athletic and shredded build, so I don't necessarily have a huge lower body build.

When I was teen, I'd always see women with wide hips, large thighs and legs, and then I'd look at myself and feel as if I needed steroids to achieve a certain leg size where it'd be equal or larger in thickness to that of a grown woman.

im just wondering, what are your thoughts when you see a man that has slimmer legs and lower body than you? Is he less masculine? Is it bad? Or is it normal?

Imagine two guys, purely from physical perspective both have sexy toned proportional athletic muscular bodies, one body however is ripped with very well defined muscles the other is much less defined, while style sexy. Imagine Gerard Butler body vs Magazine Cover type body, both sexy, ripped vs non ripped.

Does the ripped have much a big advantage when it comes to sexual attraction?

In a nutshell you have a nice guy with the body type you like, imagine the body with six pack and ripped muscles (magazine cover type) and the same body, still muscly and good but not ripped and no six pack (just normal flat stomach, Gerard Butler style body I guess) .
Does the ripped body have any serious advantage over the non ripped version? Would the ripped one exctite you more in any kind of sexual way? Or would you feel the need to touch it more than the other one?

Guy number one is not shorter than 5'9 and depending on your height (if you are 5'8 and above) will be always 2 inches (5cm) taller than you and quite cute and handsome.
Guy number two is as tall as you ideally would like (any height, up to you) but has an average face. Both guys have a good athletic body builds :)
Please consider any other factors that may influence your decision being equal.