Search Results: people preferences

I remember that when I was younger I NEVER thought that I could date or even talk to a woman that was a single mother. I also only liked only girls younger than me.

But as I grew older and ESPECIALLY after recent events I don’t see women that are under the age of 21 the same anymore. Nothing personal against any women out there because I won’t generalize but I cannot help but feel that women under the age of 21 are immature.

Furthermore, I don't know I’ve never been with an older women plus there’s just something about the idea of sleeping with a woman that is older than me that turns me on... a bunch of guys told me that older women are more freaky and vicious in the bedroom. I’ve been a dom my whole sex life, so to be dominated for once would probably make me finish prematurely if I’ll be honest lol and every woman that I have either slept with or dated was younger than me by any x amount of years.

These are just some of my thoughts, what are yours?

To be clear, I’m not talking about intersex or gender identity, I'm talking about true biological hermaphrodites. Fully functional male+female reproductive abilities, you can get pregnant & you can impregnate others. In terms of what the average person would look like (body/facial hair, muscle/fat distribution) and how 2 sets of genitals would... work, I'll leave that up to your imagination. Keep in mind though, if everybody can have kids, they'll probably need a way to feed them.

This has been on my mind for a while, I'm wondering what people think the society, culture, and basic interactions would be like. Compared to our world, do you think this hypothetical world would be better? I can think of a few reasons why/why not.

Pros:
Best of both worlds - you get both parts, 2 types of orgasms, you wouldn't be missing out on anything. You could live whatever life you want. You want to take care of kids, you want to do hard labor, work in fashion design, get a PhD? You want to go out and seduce people into your own personal harem? No gender roles hold you back, go out and do it.
Twice the dating pool - no sex preferences, any crush could be 2-sided.
Gender Equality - no sexism, we could discriminate against people for other things.

Cons:
Overpopulation - everybody can get pregnant, birthrates could potentially go way up.
Plenty of people are happy the way they are - don’t fix what isn’t broken, right?
Worst of both worlds - can't have the good without the bad, everyone would have to worry about periods, awkward boners, and pressure to live up to various expectations. But also more serious issues like genital mutilation or sexual assault.

I’ve heard people say as a con that nobody would be unique, but keep in mind, people would still have different personalities, beliefs, etc. It wouldn’t mean the end of individuality.
All in all, it wouldn't be a utopia by any means, but I think that world would be better, what about you?

Yesterday I asked a question about which kind of men people think it's the biggest group of losers ever. I even named it "the Olympic Games of Losers" and it ended in a tie between Cucks and Incels, they've beaten reputable losers like Soy Boys, Male Feminists and Enraged Liberals in a hard-fought but fair game.

Now it's the time for the winner... You vote!

Cucks: the kind of mental illness of whom that has absolutely zero self-respect, pride, honor, self-love, worthiness. They love self humiliation and could feel really happy and turned on if they saw their own wives being raped, for example, because they are actually sexual psychopaths (see the DSM-IV for paraphilias). Usually, they behave like pedophiles and sugarcoat their insanity with apparently "good excuses" (only in their sick mind).

Incels: a group of really disturbing men who are rejected by women BECAUSE OF their own social inadequacies and maladjustment. They are really toxic and can't offer nothing to society but misplaced anger, nihilism, violence. Oftentimes they mooch off their own mothers, threat or become violent against women (even to the point of killing people, like Elliot Rodgers did) or support extremist ideologies (like nazis or antifas, they don't have an actual preference for a side as group, just to extremism in general).

Who is the loser of the losers?