Polls: Religion & Spirituality

I've been thinking about the spiritual hierarchy lately and wondered if concluding that Satan treating his demons like slaves as being their master has a punchers chance at any merit. Do you think so?

Please share why you think Satan mistreats his demons or why he has them do his work! Is it due to he must seek out who he may can devour and takes away from having the proper time? Please share your best views!

To the general public, we are defined by our actions. A person that steals to feed their family is still a thief. Action speak louder than words after all. Simply apologizing for a wrong doing is not enough for many people it has to be followed by action. So what do you think is more important? Also I recognize there is subtly and nuance and you can make any myriad of situations. Don't be pedantic. Focus on the essence of the question.

There is no in-between. You either love or hate Satan. If you declare proudly that you doubt his existence, you are in essence loving Satan but if you declare proudly you doubt God's existence, you are in essence hating God. God and Satan are at war trying to make you choose them other the other.

It is mightily said that it's wrong to hate but does this apply to Satan or just to people in general for the most part? Is it okay to hate Satan or are we just supposed to not hate Satan but not love him either. By not acknowledging his responsibility for ultimate deception or evil, are you better creatures in spite of it and can be spiritually succeed by just loving God and shunning or fleeing from Satan, whether than simply wasting energy actually hating Satan? Please share your top spiritual views and issues with this. What are better spiritual paths and spiritual approaches concerning this? Give your thoughts, please!

Why is it that female ghosts are more powerful than male ghosts?

What do you think of women who wear hijabs and other religious head covers?

Some say the whole myth of "Jesus" (if that was even his real name) is almost an exact rip off of an Egyptian mythical figure called Horus.

They say Horus:
Was conceived by a virgin mother named Meri, and had a stepfather named Seb (Joseph)
Was born in a cave, his birth announced by an angel, heralded by a star and attended by shepherds
Attended a special rite of passage at the age of twelve and there is no data on the child from the age of 12 to 30
Was baptized in a river at the age of 30, and his baptizer was later beheaded
Had 12 disciples
Performed miracles, exorcized demons, raised someone from the dead, walked on water
Was called “Iusa”, the “ever-becoming son” and the “Holy Child”
Delivered a “Sermon on the Mount”, and his followers recounted his sayings
Was transfigured on the Mount
Was crucified between two thieves, buried for three days in a tomb, and was resurrected
Called “Way”, “the Truth the Light”, “Messiah”, “God’s Anointed Son”, “Son of Man”, “Good Shepherd”, “Lamb of God”, “Word made flesh”, “Word of Truth”, “the KRST” or “Anointed One”
Was “the Fisher” and was associated with the Fish, Lamb and Lion.
Came to fulfill the Law, and was supposed to reign one thousand years

So how does one explain away the similarities between the two myths?

What if you just admire it's art?

So many 'atheists' claim knowledge on what existence entails. They see themselves as experts on existence. They falsely accuse theists of not having reasons to think existences are not contained to earthly life only. Theists can provide sufficient reasons why existence is not earthly life based only. Please share your existences views very thoroughly!