Search Results: love and loss

Relativity and ambiguity seem to tarnish everything it infests with a total loss of all intrinsic value.

A man can argue that the sky is blue and not red, however, if one chooses to say that red is blue than are they both correct? There is also the scientific answer which would likely say (because Im not an expert) that the colour blue exists as material form and that the sky is not blue itself but the result of something else causing it to appear blue.

When people say that love between partners, particularily romantic relationships, cannot contain selfish acts of destruction towards their partner, EI Cheating. Is this correct? What are the rules deciding this?

The relative aspect to the question would insist that there are exceptions, the absolutist portrayal would say that a true statement mustn't be untrue or illogical and that a self contradiction to the standard of love negates the truthfulness of its concept.

The larger issue of contention is that general ambiguity has also made love personally subjective. A wife beater surely praises his own love for his wife. Love in othercases is determined by the gift of a flower.

There is also heavy nuance to it also. Whereas broadly, to hit somebody is veiwed as an act without love, however, pushing somebody out of the way of incoming vehicular traffic may be considered to be a act of love also. Does this mean love is relative, or is the form of love non self contradictory in this instance. Is it fair to distinguish all acts of love not ordained by standard definitions as subjective?