Search Results: six foot

Would you date "a 5 out of 10" who really had the hots for you?

This reminded me of someone I used to know back home. Her name was Gabby. She was many things I did not personally go for in a woman, but other men probably would've liked. She was short (5'4"/163 cm), 21 years old, petite/skinny, a B-cup, and with a slim waist and a pixie-cut blonde hairdo. She was very energetic and outgoing. She would also drink a lot and I don't like or drink alcohol.

She was a friend-of-a-friend; specifically my best friend's girlfriend's college roommate. So when I hung out with my friend on Friday nights to have dinner and play cards, and he brought his girlfriend, sometimes Gabby would be there, too.

We had a lot of things in common. We both loved the same video games, we both were artistic and drew pictures and wrote fiction. And we were both in college at the time (2017-2018).

She wasn't really my type physically, and there were too many offputting things about her for me to like anything about her romantically, including her saying how she was "bi-curious" (gross). And how she once said at the table, "I only like tall guys; like six feet and up! You know, like you!" I quickly told her I was "five-eleven, not six feet. I don't meet your dating criteria." It was such a f*cking turn-off and I already didn't like her much. Any girl who says that is dead to me as a dating option.

But she kept thinking we should get together and be a couple, and pretty much hinted at this non-stop, doing everything but outright saying it, very time I met up with my Leo and Taylor. I was single and looking at the time, and my Taylor thought me and her roommate 'look like a great couple'. But that just offended me even more, with the implication that some tiny,9 0 pound, hyper-active, alcoholic, high-energy pixie chick would be "my type" just because we had a lot of hobbies in common. I hated that people thought of me like that.

We all know that the men on GAG have unusual choices when it comes to women, like preferring really short women, very skinny women with no curves, and flat-chested women, compared to typical men, who usually like curves and large breasts on women. Which is 100% fine fine and all; I actually support men out there having different body preferences to women. In fact, I wish this was more true overall.

However, I SERIOUSLY doubt the same can be said about women when it comes to male preferences. Even on GAG, I never come across women who prefer shorter men (less than six feet), overweight men, bald men, dark-skinned men, older men (40 and up), and so on. The only thing that even comes close are a few rare women who say they like smaller penises (5.0 to 6.5 inches in length), as opposed to what most women prefer. But that's it.

Do you really think there is "a woman out there for any male body type?" Cause I don't.

Inspired by this question here, and all the other breasts question on GAG.

Men: Would you rather be a 5'11"/180 cm, fit, athletic-bodied, all-natural 34DD white woman in her 20s who makes seven figures as a model or actress or other professional (including sex work)?

Or would you rather stay a man, but you're short (under six feet), overweight, very unhealthy, ugly, have a small penis, have some kind of non-debilitating medical condition (diabetes, low blood sugar, etc.), and can barely pay the bills every month or homeless, but you're still a man.

berkeley. municipal. codes/BMC/10.04.120

When I'm walking around Berkeley I frequently see dog owners take their leash off a dog at parks and in children's playgrounds. I also sometimes see more than four dogs at a time in a dog park. According to Berkeley law I have the right to call the cops on them right?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10.04.120
Dogs in public playgrounds and parks prohibited--Impoundment required--Exception.

A. Except in an area specifically set aside and designated by the City Council as a "dog park," or "off-leash" area, it is unlawful for any person to permit any dog, whether or not such dog is licensed, to be in or upon any public playground or park maintained by the City, unless such dog is securely restrained by a substantial leash not to exceed six feet in length. Dogs are not permitted in sand or wood chip covered play equipment areas or in totland or other fenced tot play areas or in the Berkeley Rose Garden under any circumstances. Any dog found in or upon any playground or park as hereinafter designated, except those meeting the above criteria SHALL BE IMPOUNDED (emphasis added).

B. In any "dog park" or "off-leash" area set aside and designated as such by the City Council, no more than four dogs per owner/guardian, or per responsible party shall be allowed at any one time, and the owner/guardian, or responsible party, must be physically present at all times. Any dog whose owner/guardian, or responsible party, is not physically present SHALL BE IMPOUNDED (emphasis added) pursuant to Section 10.04.200 of the Berkeley Municipal Code.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Also Emeryville law is mostly the same:
codepublishing. com/5-24.06