Search Results: what's more appealing

When it comes to dating. I tend to feel like they aren’t that visual. Like with men we just look at a girl and we’re wowed. Whereas I don’t think a handsome man has much appeal like that. More like - Yh he’s handsome so?

"Now, that message of free trade is one I conveyed to Canada's leaders a few weeks ago, and it was warmly received there. Indeed, throughout the world there's a growing realization that the way to prosperity for all nations is rejecting protectionist legislation and promoting fair and free competition... And today many economic analysts and historians argue that high tariff legislation passed back in that period, called the Smoot-Hawley tariff, greatly deepened the depression and prevented economic recovery.

You see, at first, when someone says, ``Let's impose tariffs on foreign imports,'' it looks like they're doing the patriotic thing by protecting American products and jobs. And sometimes for a short while it works -- but only for a short time. What eventually occurs is:

First, homegrown industries start relying on government protection in the form of high tariffs. They stop competing and stop making the innovative management and technological changes they need to succeed in world markets.

And then, while all this is going on, something even worse occurs. High tariffs inevitably lead to retaliation by foreign countries and the triggering of fierce trade wars.

The result is more and more tariffs, higher and higher trade barriers, and less and less competition. So, soon, because of the prices made artificially high by tariffs that subsidize inefficiency and poor management, people stop buying.

Then the worst happens: Markets shrink and collapse; businesses and industries shut down; and millions of people lose their jobs.

There are those in this Congress, just as there were back in the thirties, who want to go for the quick political advantage, who will risk America's prosperity for the sake of a short-term appeal to some special interest group, who forget that millions of American jobs are directly tied to the foreign export business and additional millions are tied to imports. Well, I've never forgotten those jobs."

In the last century many changes have rolled through society between the sexes. Changes in dynamics, expectations, responsibilities and appearance.

This last one is where the question is about. The last few generations of humanity have seen women's attire change from feminine to masculine and everything in between and men have generally accepted and been welcoming of such things and little has happened in regards to whether men will see women dressed in skirts and dresses or jeans and hoodies are appealing and attractive and worthy of dating and this leads me to see men as more accepting of this change.

However, I do not believe the same can be said for women. WOULD women still find a man dressed in more feminine ways as appealing and attractive and worthy of dating?

LETS NOT HAVE A DISCUSSION OF HOW MANY GENDERS THERE ARE OR IF ITS FLUID!! Just chime in on the parties!

More than one-third (35%) of Americans say these parties are “unnecessary,” 30% say they’re “trendy,” 28% say they’re “silly,” and another 28% say they’re a “fad,” 27% say "self indulgent" and 25% say "fun" according to new data from YouGov Omnibus.

In USA America, generational attitudes toward gender reveal parties vary significantly:

Millennials: Millennials, who popularized gender reveal parties in the late 2000s, often view them as fun and celebratory events, fueled by social media trends. However, some millennials have grown critical of the concept for reinforcing gender stereotypes.

Gen X: Many Gen X individuals see gender reveal parties as unnecessary or overly elaborate, often blaming social media for their rise. Some perceive them as shallow or attention-seeking.

Baby Boomers: Boomers tend to be more skeptical or indifferent toward the trend. They are less likely to understand its appeal and may view it as a modern fad driven by younger generations.

Gen Z: With half of Gen Z believing gender is a spectrum, they are more likely to criticize gender reveal parties for enforcing binary concepts of gender. They may prefer celebrations that focus on broader aspects of parenthood rather than traditional gender norms.

There is an apparent gender conflict going on that has polarised men and women with non binary usually tending toward the women's end that has created a lot of toxicity and relationship challenges that has seen a rise of things MGTOW and 4B away from interaction between the members of a social species because of political leanings about how society has treated and perceived injustices between each side that seem to ignore the others points of view.

Given that women tend to be the victims of sex based crime but men are of crime in general (while also ignoring reasons why it's also men who end up in a life of crime as well as making up most of the low status positions and as victims of societies lack of provisions for those in need such as homelessness, poverty, destitution, domestic violence, etc.) the current narrative is that women negatively prejudice against men they don't know as threatening or risky until a man proves himself to not be so while women are not regarded similarly.

So should employment be restricted in a similar way that women can request a female doctor for consultation, that men should therefore be appraised on their suitability for jobs by other men instead of having mixed or women only employment panels. (One could use the same notion that women getting jobs over men because they're more appealing to the eye and thus able to use that attraction for a business as being a valid reason for employing them in the first place)