Search Results: Poll Questions

The movie industry has produced some truly awful sequels... truly awful. I know that I've certainly seen some that were so bad that it's hard to believe that someone somewhere was paid money to create them... usually a lot of money.

So what's the worst movie sequel that you've ever seen? Comment down below!

Bonus question: I'm going to throw some of my most hated sequels into the poll options. Out of those you've seen, which of the 7 was the worst?

Okay okay, this is intended as a jokey question alright :)
I only considered doing it because there is a certain 2 G@Gers who are in a relationship and make it obvious and they know who they are, one who's name has the words weebtrash in it and the other one has denim in it :D

So, the question at hand, would anyone on G@G have a relationship with me the same way those two do or do I already have a G@G member who thinks like this?

I honestly don't expect any to choose option A, I just want to see a interesting poll :)

I think that most people HATES to read on G@G
but lets see what the poll says

So I was just on a post the other day and it was about illegal immigration. Majority of the poll said they were against having open borders and this ignorant man said something like "Have to wonder how they would react if the illegals were white." This kind of stuff really gets old after awhile. Illegal immigration is just that. ILLEGAL. Has nothing to do with race. I wouldn't expect Mexico or some Arabian country to just let me in illegally and just accept it. And to answer his question no I don't want people from white countries coming here illegally. Go through the process and I'm okay with you. Are these people racist inside or is there some kind of explanation for their flawed logic?

This is a question inspired by a twitter poll i recently saw, so here is a bit of context.

Lets say there are three rapists accused, one is actually a rapist but two are innocent.
In these cases the girls are late to the party and can no longer create the proper evidence.

If you as the court decide to go based on the claims of the girls alone, you will catch a rapist and prevent him from doing harm however two other men will have there life's destroyed and get put in an environment full of criminals that since they are good man will get taken full advantage off in the prison system as they aren't used to fights or to defend themselves in a crowd. These guys will never get a job, get traumatized in the prison and will never be the same and there family will be without a father. However, the third rapist is caught and that means that you stopped him from creating more victims.

Or do you dismiss the cases based on the facts there is not enough evidence? The two man can use this to there peers to proof they are innocent, still have a bit of a stigma but since they are proven innocent they can rebuild there life's. But, the rapist is still around vulnerable girls and can take advantage off them at any moment creating new victims who may be to afraid to report and there for stop him.

Normally you wouldn't know how many are innocent, but this time its part of the question so you have a bit of an insight. You don't know who is innocent or who raped though, so the poll contains no options for further research as there is absolutely not enough evidence based on the case and even the lie detector tests where not consistent.

So Judge GAG, what is your ruling?