Search Results: hot boy

This question has been asked regarding what kind of girls guys prefer.

"Cute" would be more boy-ish like. A bit younger-looking, I guess?
"Hot" would be to excude more sexual appeal. More masculine.


And while we would all like to answer "both", keep in mind this is between one or the other.

I have feeling girls only prefer badboys/gangsters, is this true? I know nerdy girls prefer shy guys but mostly this hot girls prefer only some bad boys? Is this true? I really like one girl but she is really hot and i think she is into badboys and im not one. I look like one but im not. Do i have chance? She stare in me a lot but im kinda shy. Do girls prefer guys who are trying to be gangsters, dangerous and trying to look cool or actually one who look like that but they dont want to be ones and are not idiots?

Similar to bad boys turning good girls bad, is it common that there are older ladies that are into that as well? I’m (22M) seeing someone (39F) who kind of fits into that profile (she has a lot of tattoos and drinks, smokes a lot). She’s been getting a bit freaky with me and texted me that I’d look a lot hotter with tattoos. And I kind of enjoy it, as fucked up as it is.

Title.

We as guys often refer to attractive girls by a number of different adjectives: Pretty; cute; hot; sexy; lovely; gorgeous, etc. My question to you is this-- what is the real difference between any of them? I often see girls on here asking odd questions such as "Hey guys which do you prefer, cute girls or sexy girls?" And my answer generally is, "Yes."

The reason-- for the decision to not entertain a choice between the two I mean-- is that *they're the same damn thing.* Either a girl is attractive enough that you would date her or want to kiss her or have sex with her, or she's not. Period. The rest is just splitting hairs in my opinion. If she's not attractive enough that you'd want to bang her, then how on earth is she "cute, but not hot?" Cute implies physical attraction at least on some level. So if she's not attractive enough to want to get with, why are you using any of those adjectives at all? Or, conversely, if she IS attractive enough, why not use any of them interchangeably?

I'm not suggesting that all attractive girls are EQUALLY attractive, I mean there's the 10 scale for a reason ("she's a 7/10" as opposed to "she's a 9/10" or whatever), but how does saying like "She'd be hotter if only blah blah blah" have any different meaning than "She'd be sexier if only blah blah blah."

No difference from what I can see. ^ The girl above is cute AND hot AND pretty AND sexy, not one or the other. Anyway, tell me. What do you guys think?