Search Results: she is reckless

We’re all both, like extrovert/introverts, but which side gets you more success?

I always admired skateboarders. How many bruises and broken bones do they have and still get back on the horse? Or the board? Motorcyclists? They’re suicidal.

I know it’s difficult for most people to do. But really try to put your personal opinions aside about Trump’s personality and character when it comes to the question of inflation and the economy. I will be the first to admit Trump’s a scumbag and a self-centered one at that. Although I also believe Biden’s character is even worse (and the media protects him) I again will admit that Trump is a narcissist. I do NOT want to see him run against Biden again. No.

However back to the economy. I do not think everything would be wonderful right now if Trump was in office. However things would be much better. The government CAN f*ck up the economy and this how Biden did it:

• Insane spending on bs most Americans don’t want or need. The giant oxymoron “the inflation reduction act” is exactly the last thing our country needs. But it got passed anyway thanks to Joe Manchin caving to bs promises. This should have been called the inflation expansion act. $1.2 trillion of taxpayer money we can’t afford spent on bs we don’t need.
• Onerous regulation on domestic oil drilling which skyrocketed energy costs. Yes global warming is real. But you can not destroy our economy thinking that will “solve” global warming. But Biden’s suggestion is for everybody to go out and buy a $80k electric car (he really did say that). Energy costs get factored into everything and it directly contributed to inflation.
• Reckless and disasterous pull out of Afghanistan which emboldened Putin to invade the Ukraine. So if Trump and Putin were supposedly in bed then why didn’t Putin invade the Ukraine while Trump was in office and not Biden? Trump would of went soft on Russia right? No Putin felt emboldened to invade after Biden demonstrated pure fecklessness on the world stage with Afganistán. This lead to the war and skyrocketing energy costs given Russia is a huge exporter of oil. This wouldn’t of happened under Trump.

https://news.yahoo.com/donald-trump-claims-arrested-tuesday-123858994.html
Donald Trump claims he will be arrested Tuesday in Manhattan probe, calls for protests

Former President Donald Trump said he expects to be arrested Tuesday in connection with an investigation conducted by the Manhattan District Attorney's office and is calling for protests ahead of his possible indictment.

Danielle Filson, a spokesperson for Manhattan's District Attorney's office, declined to comment on the former president's statement.

Trump is under investigation for a $130,000 payment he made just before the 2016 election to silence adult film star Stormy Daniels about an earlier affair. The former president has denied wrongdoing, and federal investigators ended their own inquiry into the payments in 2019.

A little FYI (and Im sticking true to my name)
Sec. §240.08 NYPL
Inciting to Riot
§ 240.08 Inciting to riot. A person is guilty of inciting to riot when he urges ten or more persons to engage in tumultuous and violent conduct of a kind likely to create public alarm. Inciting to riot is a class A misdemeanor.

§ 240.05 Riot in the second degree
A person is guilty of riot in the second degree when, simultaneously with four or more other persons, he engages in tumultuous and violent conduct and thereby intentionally or recklessly causes or creates a grave risk of causing public alarm.

Riot in the second degree is a class A misdemeanor.
Reckless Endangerment in the First Degree
§ 120.25 Reckless endangerment in the first degree. A person is guilty of reckless endangerment in the first degree when, under circumstances evincing a depraved indifference to human life, he recklessly engages in conduct which creates a grave risk of death to another person. Reckless endangerment in the first degree is a class D felony.
====

https://www.cpr.org/2023/02/24/assault-charge-dropped-against-officer-who-put-20-year-old-in-patrol-car-hit-by-train/
Assault charge dropped against officer who put 20-year-old in patrol car hit by train

Weld County prosecutors have dismissed an assault charge against a Fort Lupton police officer who placed a woman in a patrol car that was later struck by a train.

Jordan Steinke still faces one felony count of criminal attempt to commit manslaughter and a misdemeanor count of reckless endangerment. The original second-degree assault charge was also a felony.

“Upon further review, we have decided to move forward with existing charges that we feel are most appropriate in this case,” Weld County DA spokesperson Krista Henery wrote in an emailed statement. “Because of pending litigation, I cannot comment further about how and why we had to make this decision.”

Former Platteville police officer Pablo Vazquez pulled over Yareni Rios-Gonzalez for an alleged road rage incident involving a gun in Weld County, near Highway 85 and County road 38 on Sept. 16.

Steinke and another Fort Lupton officer arrived and placed the 20 year-old in the back of a patrol car that was illegally parked on nearby railroad tracks. During a search of Rios-Gonzalez’s pickup truck, a train hit the patrol car while she was inside.

Attorneys for Rios-Gonzalez said she suffered serious bodily injuries from the incident. She has filed a lawsuit against both Fort Lupton and Platteville police departments.

Vasquez faces five misdemeanor counts of reckless endangerment, one count of obstruction of a highway or passageway, one count of careless driving, and one count of parking where prohibited. The second Fort Lupton officer involved has not been charged.

Steinke is due in court March 2. Rios-Gonzalez still faces a menacing charge related to the incident.

https://news.yahoo.com/conservative-judge-could-block-nationwide-202900593.html?fr=sycsrp_catchall
Conservative judge could block nationwide abortion pill access any day now, as Dems fight for even broader access

An upcoming ruling by a conservative judge could lead to a ban on medication abortion in the U. S., but advocates for abortion healthcare filed their own lawsuit Friday to expand access.

U. S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, who was appointed by former President Donald Trump, is expected to rule on a lawsuit filed last year by anti-abortion organizations. The groups seek to force the Food and Drug Administration to withdraw its decades-old approval of mifepristone, one of the two medications used for the medical termination of pregnancies.

The lawsuit was filed by the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) — a prominent conservative legal advocacy organization designated as an extremist hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center due to its decades-long work against LGBTQ rights — on behalf of four organizations and four doctors who object to the FDA’s authorization.

“We ask the court to hold the FDA accountable for its reckless, unlawful behavior,” said Erik Baptist, a senior counsel with the ADF, an organization that was also involved in the Mississippi case that eventually led to the overturn of Roe v. Wade last year.

A ruling is expected any day now, and a decision in favor of the anti-abortion organizations could immediately block the sale of mifepristone.

But a group of Democratic attorneys general fought back Friday with a lawsuit of their own, seeking to make access to mifepristone easier.