Search Results: Need an explanation

I've been saying for 20 years that I thought both Dark Matter and Dark Energy were science fraud, and now more and more scientists are starting to feel the same way. It' sa shame people won Nobel Prizes for this junk science with no evidence whatsoever to support the claims. I can prove that the Dark Energy dataset is not better than 1 sigma, even if it is not a fraud, but the scientific standard of "Discovery" is supposed to be 5 sigma in physics. So this is simply not acceptable and not Nobel Worthy. The team that made this announcement back in the late 1990's has committed fraudulent science and needs to be barred from the community and possibly sued by the Nobel committee and various physics journals.

Same goes for Dark Matter. I can explain galaxy stellar rotation curves with no need for Dark Matter, using only Einstein and Newton's equations and ordinary, visible matter. If you do the correct N-body for a galaxy, you do NOT need Dark Matter to explain the orbital curves of the stars. I believe Dark Matter is an intentional science fraud.

Finally, Crab Nebula Supernova is not an Electron Capture supernova, it's an anti-matter supernova, a totally new class of supernova, and the Crab Nebula Pulsar is misclassified. It's supposed to be classified as a Magnetar, not an "Optical Pulsar". This nobel got awarded prematurely too.

The committee shouldn't give Nobels until after the award winner (s) are already dead, that way you would avoid most forms of science fraud and give the community time to verify the alleged "discovery" and rule out alternative explanations of the phenomenon. The way they do things right now encourages fraud and hoaxes.

What do you think about any of this?