Polls: Sports

Now that millions of people have seen the FIFA Men's World Cup 2026, there is a lot of discussion of who is the greatest soccer player of all time.

Who do you think is the GOAT (Greatest Of All Time)?

Please vote in the poll, and explain your choice if you want.

Note: The players in this question are considered great, but there are thousands who have played the game at a high level. These players are shown with the country they play for internationally, though they may also play, or have played, with professional teams in other countries. For example, among others, Pele played for New York Cosmos in the United States, Messi played for Barcelona in Spain and Miami in the United States, and Ronaldo and Mbappe each played for Real Madrid in Spain.

The 2026 FIFA Men's World Cup was an overwhelming success, with more fans in attendance than the previous two World Cups combined, and billions of dollars earned by FIFA, more than any other World Cup in history. And 2026 brought billions of dollars to the three host countries: Canada, Mexico, United States (CANMEXUS)

The FIFA World Cup is held every 4 years, and moves from place to place, as cities make bids to hold it.

With 2026 being so successful, hosted by Canada, Mexico and the United States (CANMEXUS), should FIFA consider changing its rules and pick a permanent site for the World Cup? CANMEXUS would probably like that.

What do you think?

Please vote in the poll.

The World Super Bowl Trophy for football is not a Bowl, and the soccer World Cup is not a Cup, have the competitions organisers gone mad.

What is your opinion?

Me and my mom thought it was stupid, all over the place and the choice of artists was poor, except Shakira. And I don't know what was up with the kids and the brass band. The idea was good, but the execution was poor. We didn't even recognize Madonna. They didn't even perform THEIR songs but World Cup themed songs. If they were gonna do that, they should've just gotten Shakira by herself. Or my dad said a country singer would've been better. But at the same time, it felt weird. This isn't the Super Bowl and it added an additional 10 minutes to the halftime. I don't think they should do it again.

The next World Cup the opening matches will be played in Argentina, Uruguay & Paraguay. Messi will be 43. I don't expect to start and play full time, but I think they should at least put him on for a few minutes in Argentina's opening match, so he can be the first player to play in 7 world cups

I'm watching now and i'm cheering for Argentina (Messi) ⚽️ 😁 🏆

We don't want political scenes like this in the World Cup, with the Argentinan players also causing clashes with the supporters not only in the ground, but also everywhere the match was shown on public screens.

A similar occurrence happened this year in the African Cup of Nations, with the players walking off the pitch because they disagreed with the referees decision.

The right decision was finally made with the African Cup Final, and the same decision should be made before Argentina play in this final.

What is your opinion?

With the World Cup excitement going on, I'm not a die-hard fan myself, but in general, men who think football is stupid tend to be gay. In fact, if gay people make up around 3% of society, then among male footballers that figure is at most 0.03%.

I say male footballers because when it comes to women, the situation is supposedly the complete opposite. Perhaps 90% of female footballers are lesbians. They usually sleep with their teammates, and when they transfer to another club, they break up and get together with another teammate.

A certain person famously argued that it was immoral for women to take part in fields like football and basketball. According to him, men created such sports to compensate for their biological "deficiency"—namely, not being able to give birth.

As for the issue they constantly complain about—pay—they are not producing an equal level of performance. Fifteen-year-old boys can dribble circles around them. But if stadiums were actually full of people coming to watch them, then I could say they had a point about the pay issue. Still, why would someone choose to watch a match that offers less entertainment?

Like the closest club to my town is in second league, and only plays other second league teams. But if they got the chance to play with first league teams, I would attend a match. I even accidently found a third tier. They've only done expansion teams, where basically the US Soccer federation decides who can be a first league team and who can't. I think having a relegation system would be better and more fair, and give good lower division teams the chance to be in MLS, and poor performing teams to not be in MLS.

What do you guys think?

Argentina had a goal waved off because Messi was offside, even though he didn't make contact with the ball.

One player got whistled for being offside in his own half

One player got a goal waved off because he was offside by half a foot, and another by half a TOENAIL🤣

The US had a goal waved off because his SHOULDER was offside

And last night controversy errupted after a Croatia goal was waved off, because the player was offside, even though the ball bounced off the head of an opponent before reaching him.

Nahhhhhhhh, this is ridiculous! Something needs to change