Polls: Fashion & Beauty

I'm just wondering since I have a temporary work VISA in Poland so I will be living here for a couple of years for work-related reasons and would love to meet a couple of girls here. I have a preference for thick/curvy women and here are a few pictures of a Polish Instagram fitness model girl, who possesses the body shape I'd love in a woman. Unfortunately, Polish women with a body shape like hers (pictures below) most likely make up around 0.01 percent of Poland's female population since all the Polish women I've seen around me so far, lack a shapely body and the fact that Europe, especially Slavic countries, prefer thin women as their beauty standards.








I honestly think it is a bummer how girls like in the video and pictures above, are an extreme rarity, especially here in Poland.

So I pretty much just found these 2 pictures on Google, on some website talking about embarrasing skirt stories... apparently these 2 women both did a photoshoot of themselves wearing cute dresses... and then after the photoshoot they went to hang out with their friends on a night out, but had to go home to put on jeans and wear the dress as a sort of long shirt because apparently the dresses were too "short" and "embarrassing" to wear out in public. While they never flashed, they said they "almost did." They also said that while standing up the dresses were only a bit more than a hand above the knee, but rose up to almost their thighs as they sat.

But as for me, personally... they don't seem that short to me. Maybe it's because I live somewhere hot and women wear dresses that length all the time, but they just don't seem that short.

For the girl in black, if she's gonna sit like THAT than sure, it's too short... but if she sat normally, than no. As for the one in pink... she's doing it perfectly, even in the photo. Just sit with legs together, or crossed. It's miles away from actually flashing her underwear.

Also, when they wore jeans with the dresses, it did NOT look good. It looked so much better when they wore JUST the dresses as shown. Those dresses were made to be worn bare legged! Plus, if flashing was really that big a deal to them, some spandex booty shorts would've done the trick much better.

I bought a suit to go to interviews and career fairs on my college campus. Here are some pics



I got it tapered and everything, however I think they need to take more off the sides because I have more of a V shaped body. What do you think? Too big, just right, or too small?

Title.

We as guys often refer to attractive girls by a number of different adjectives: Pretty; cute; hot; sexy; lovely; gorgeous, etc. My question to you is this-- what is the real difference between any of them? I often see girls on here asking odd questions such as "Hey guys which do you prefer, cute girls or sexy girls?" And my answer generally is, "Yes."

The reason-- for the decision to not entertain a choice between the two I mean-- is that *they're the same damn thing.* Either a girl is attractive enough that you would date her or want to kiss her or have sex with her, or she's not. Period. The rest is just splitting hairs in my opinion. If she's not attractive enough that you'd want to bang her, then how on earth is she "cute, but not hot?" Cute implies physical attraction at least on some level. So if she's not attractive enough to want to get with, why are you using any of those adjectives at all? Or, conversely, if she IS attractive enough, why not use any of them interchangeably?

I'm not suggesting that all attractive girls are EQUALLY attractive, I mean there's the 10 scale for a reason ("she's a 7/10" as opposed to "she's a 9/10" or whatever), but how does saying like "She'd be hotter if only blah blah blah" have any different meaning than "She'd be sexier if only blah blah blah."

No difference from what I can see. ^ The girl above is cute AND hot AND pretty AND sexy, not one or the other. Anyway, tell me. What do you guys think?

So my whole life, I've always assumed girls/women had on small spandex shorts when they wore skirts/dresses.

However, me and my girlfriend went to the beach the other day... and after we were done having fun at the beach, we put on regular clothes over our swim wear. And she just whipped on a dress, above the knee length on top of her bikini in 5 seconds, and said, "I'm ready honey!" And I asked her, "Really? I mean you don't really have anything on under your dress. You have your bikini bottoms, but they just basically look like underwear. Are you really gonna go walk around in public like that?" And she laughed really hard, and said that you're not supposed to wear anything but underwear under a skirt/dress, and that she and all of her friends just wear underwear, and no girl she knows wears shorts or anything else underneath.

It was then that my fucking mind was blown... so every time I saw a girl in a skirt/dress, she most likely only had underwear underneath? It's especially weird in a skirt/dress that goes above the knees. Meaning if only she spread her legs out a bit more, everyone would see her underwear? Does the average women really not care about that type of stuff?

As a guy that's a pretty absurd thought, as the male equivalent of that would be whipping on a long shirt slightly above the knee, wearing only some boxer-briefs underneath, and just going out in public like that...

And as such, I'm here asking to see what the general thing REALLY is.

Is it just simply the way skirts/dresses are traditionally worn, but most women are still bothered and wear shorts? Do most women not care and just wear the underwear?

Maybe I'm just overthinking it. I'm trying to literally relate to girls who wear skirts/dresses with the long shirt thing, when I'm not even SUPPOSED to. Skirts/dresses are a girl thing. Just wearing underwear underneath for in specific girls is normal, and not something guys should relate to.

But maybe my thoughts are reasonable after all

It's not to say that Polish women are unattractive. I still think they look nice but not that great as nearly all men that I've encountered all over the internet, make them out to be, as if they're all perfect-looking goddesses. Polish women don't seem to age too well and most Polish women are a little too slim for my taste (body shape). To me, they, alongside with Scandinavian women, are a little overrated in terms of appearance and not that special-looking. If anything, I'd say Southern European women (Spanish and Italian women in particular, are one of the most attractive women in the world).

Are beards and thick male body hair one of the worst things of a man and it would have been a better world if men were as smooth as possible?




A better world!😍






by the way happy women's day everyone!

Kataluna Enriquez, Filipino American beauty pageant contestant from San Francisco, California.
She is 24 years old.