Polls

I think you’re super rich when you are worth 10million US dollars or more. When you hit that mark. That for me is the threshold

I am looking at my life and thinking how I am manifesting. Me at 30 will be much more desirable than I am now. I am doimg well but not anywhere near I will be

I found out my friends dads rolls Royce cost $290k US dollars. It’s a ghost black badge 2023 model. Blacked out

I asked a question before but I got new information from my other friend

https://www.techexplorist.com/historic-milestone-two-people-communicate-dreams/91175/

A guy I went to school with, his dad bought a rolls Royce. I don’t know mucho about cars but sounds big. Someone showed my a photo, I don’t know what his family do but I was really close to him when I was a kid.

With my ex I literally feel in love with her before I met her I saw her Instagram and I was just like 😳 besotted with how beautiful she was and then when I met her and she was acting all sweet and girly I lost my mind I was like I need to make her mine!!

Are girls the same?

I believe the Founding Fathers shown here would overwhelmingly reject the DSA’s proposals to replace major parts of the constitutional system they created.

George Washington would likely view abolishing or replacing core institutions as a threat to the national unity and constitutional order he spent his later life building and defending.

Benjamin Franklin supported reform and adaptation, but he also urged compromise and accepted the Constitution as the best system the Convention could produce. I believe he would favor lawful amendments over dismantling the structure entirely.

John Adams feared concentrated power, factionalism, and unchecked majorities. He would likely strongly oppose eliminating constitutional checks such as an independent judiciary and a bicameral legislature.

Alexander Hamilton defended a strong federal government, an energetic executive, the Senate, and an independent judiciary. He would probably be among the DSA agenda’s fiercest opponents.

James Madison, the principal architect of the Constitution, designed checks and balances specifically because no faction or temporary majority should control the entire government. He would likely see the DSA’s proposals as destroying those safeguards.

Thomas Jefferson was more suspicious of centralized power and more open to periodic reform, but he championed natural rights and limited government. I do not believe he would accept replacing the Founders’ system with centralized socialist control.

Overall, they might support constitutional amendments and reforms through the process they created, but I believe they would resist an agenda aimed at abolishing major institutions and replacing their constitutional republic with an entirely different political order.

Radical DSA manifesto calls to abolish presidency, US Senate and Electoral College - https://nypost.com/2026/07/16/us-news/radical-dsa-manifesto-calls-to-abolish-presidency-us-senate-and-electoral-college/

Islamic activist Linda Sarsour, who is a member of the communist DSA, used Independence Day to bolster fellow fascists’ spirits. She wanted them to know they would win, and she planned to replace the Declaration of Independence with a document reflecting her values. - https://www.independentsentinel.com/radical-islamist-wants-to-replace-the-declaration-of-independence/

The Declaration of Independence is not merely an old document to be discarded whenever activists decide America needs new “values.” It states the foundational principles of the United States: that all people possess inherent rights, that those rights do not come from government, and that legitimate government derives its authority from the consent of the governed.

Calling for a new document to replace or supersede the Declaration is therefore an attack on the philosophical foundation of the country. It is an attempt to substitute the Founders’ principles of natural rights, limited government, and individual liberty with a new ideological vision defined by today’s political movement.

The Declaration acknowledged that America had often failed to live up to its principles. The proper response is to apply those principles more faithfully—not erase and replace them. A movement that wants to rewrite America’s founding creed is not simply proposing another economic reform. It is openly seeking to redefine what the United States is and what it stands for.

Women tend to be more emotional and more concerned with social issues, so they often lean more toward left-wing views. Is it possible to get women into bed by pretending to care about feminism and human rights?

when play wrestling with who ever like you boyfriend/girlfriend is tickling considered cheating? Would you consider it a legit win or a fake one?

At no point has Argentina or spain ever owned them and mo Argentinans ever settled there.

Basically in the early 80s the Argentinan fascist government decided that they wanted them to distract from economic and social problems at home believing that Britain as it had largely dismantled its military by late 1970 wouldn't go to war over the Falklands.

The complete defeat in the Falklands was a major humiliation for Argentinan national pride and they try to remedy this with soccer. Im sure the reason this has come to the fore again is that Argentinan once again is in trouble economically.

The people who live in the Falklands are British and don't want to be part of Argentina.

I’d say Trump/MAGA because, in my view, defending democracy requires more than repeatedly calling political opponents a “threat.” It requires protecting both lawful access to the ballot and confidence that only eligible citizens vote, voter rolls are accurate, ballots remain auditable, and election systems are secure.

President Trump has advanced a specific election-integrity agenda: proof of citizenship for federal voter registration through the SAVE America Act, citizenship-verification tools for states, enforcement against unlawful voting, stronger voter-roll maintenance, paper-based voting safeguards, and greater scrutiny of vulnerabilities in electronic election systems.

Democrats say they are defending democracy through voter-registration drives, voting-rights litigation, and opposition to measures they believe could remove eligible voters. Those are real activities, but I disagree with their approach when they oppose citizenship-documentation requirements, resist federal examination of voter rolls, or portray audits and verification measures as voter suppression rather than working toward safeguards that protect both access and integrity.

Democracy is not protected by treating every Republican proposal as “fascism” or by claiming Trump and MAGA are inherently illegitimate. It is protected when eligible citizens can vote, unlawful votes are prevented, every lawful ballot is counted accurately, results can be independently verified, and political disagreements are resolved through elections and constitutional institutions.

That is why I believe Trump/MAGA are doing more to defend American democracy and election integrity than Democrats and the DSA.