Search Results: do people have the right not to be judged

Let's be honest here it's not the actual abortion that offends us. When you get down to the root of it most guys that I have talked to admit this. The issue is sexual discrimination and ambiguity. As a man if you have kids and decide to leave them you're considered a horrible person. How could you do that to a human being you're a bad person they say. It creates this idea of right and wrong based on decisions. The issue with this is women are the only ones allowed to leave / hurt children. Hell if you got mommy issues women make fun of you and call you weak especially feminists to say you don't have any sex. Staying on topic between the two sexes women are not judge for aborting babies abusing their kids or turning them against their fathers. Their fight is not to be judged but control information so you can't judge them. You're not allowed to know how many abortions women have but if a man has one child it follows him to his grave. Both of our decisions that people make regardless of sex but women are the only ones who get to do this with no repercussions. I feel that the only way to fix this is for them to admit that men who leave their children are not bad people ergo losing the men's end. Or holding women more accountable or tightening it. The fact that we can admit this will always Crush feminism. And it's the elephant in the room or womb that women forces us to ignore. I would like to know however you're educated answer on this topic also remember if you're not willing to address the question that you're not willing to change anything and please don't respond yes or no what changes do you think should be made?

Say pass a test of above 110 iq to qualify as a judge

i think they should have to so that judges become more rational, logical, reasonable, and fair... a lot of judges seem to be dumb.

for example... I was on a video about these guys called dentroptovsk maniacs or something (3guys that killed and murdered people with hammers and stuff and filmed it)
but one of them only filmed and didn’t participate in any of the murders... but he gets 9yrs for it?
that doesn’t seem right to me...

im not defending what they did, the guys who actually did the killings deserve to be tortured to hell and put in a brazen bull... but I put myself in cameraman’s shoes and feel abit bad he gets 9yrs jus for that... here’s my reasoning... there’s people online who watch real murder videos on shock sites out of morbid curiosity (whilst having no desire to commit the murders there self) but they jus enjoying watching it... well... what difference does it make if you’re watching the vid online behind a pc screen or in real life behind a camera? Why is the camera man treated any worse than online viewers who watch the vid?
the online viewers aren’t treated like criminals, they’re allowed to watch the vid... and like the online viewers... the camera man might have not had any intentions to ever kill either... he might not have even egged them along to do it... they probably was gonna do it without him if he didn’t film it anyway... so when they asked him if he wanted to come along n film... his morbid curiosity was probably like “yeah, why not jus go along to see n film it? They’re gonna do it anyway”

i dont think its fair he's gets 9yrs for that when online viewers get no time in prison for their morbid curiosity, but he does jus because he watched behind a camera screen instead of a pc screen? Wtf.. judges are dumb