Search Results: find your true love today

Recentlay a GaG'er asked a question about how long girls waited before having sex. Girls received a lot of unhappy down votes for choosing to wait. Guys don't realize we don't wait to play games, we wait to be sure you are on the path to genuinely liking us. We know that having sex won't make you fall for us and we like to be more secure. If we are waiting it is because sex is important to us personally.

I know the following is true: Guys don't have sex to fall in love, they fall in love to have sex. If a guy is only interested in sex, nothing will change that. But how about the opposite? What if you were thinking of a potential longer term thing?

If you met a girl for the first date and ended up sleeping with her, would that color your opinions of her? Like, "wow, she is easy. I'll keep her for sex but not thinking of anything more now." Or does it truly not matter?

If it DOES matter, how long/what is the time frame you look for before having sex with a girl you are considering for a LTR is acceptable?

Today's world, so many girls find themselves throwing it away so easily, then being heartbroken when the guy treats them like a friends with benefits with no interest in anything more. Some even claim to be immune and only in it for the sex, but most are truly shattered and feel used. Is there a correlation?

Truth, honest truth. I know a lot of you guys are younger and just have sex on the brain, but think about this question seriously for a minute:

If a girl sleeps with you too soon, does it change your opinion of her and what you expect from her?

Bonus question: what is the "magic" number of dates you will go on before you expect sex from someone (I know each situation is different, but roughly) you are considering for a LTR?

If you don't care for the specific question or backstory, the main idea is what are logical arguments for or against christianity, specifically on the subject of Jesus.

This is a really great community for sound answers and is a great blend of people (I'm looking for average people, not the extremists you often find on religious debate forums) so I ask this here. I have a very religious boyfriend but religion was never really taught in my life until now other than my mom's strange blend of Earth spirits and Buddhism, so naturally it's a difficult concept to suddenly be brought into (yeah I know it's not the best match but I'm open to learning). He mentions Jesus as the basis for God existing on the Lord, Liar, or Lunatic premise as well as love between others indirectly being the work of God (not he decides who loves whom, but rather we love one another because there is a God or something to that effect...). If we take the aspects of the bible yet to be proved false (creation in a week kinda stuff) to be true and the bible is the written and many times edited and translated version of oral tradition, is there a chance that Jesus was misquoted saying he is God? If he is considered the "only way" to God, can it be rightly/wrongly construed to mean there are no other prophets or ways of life that lead to Heaven? I have often wondered if the strong surviving monotheistic religions in the world today are all referring to the same entity but within a slightly different facet of it (Judaism, Christianity, Islam). Boyfriend says that's logical until we examine the claim that Jesus made of being the only way to God, which proves the other religions in the world false. Can anyone make sense of this for me? Thanks a bunch for your input and um... God bless/good luck/have a wonderful day if N/A? :D

Sidenote: Are we doomed as a couple? D: My children would be so confused!