Search Results: what is love true love marriage

Just skip to the conclusion if you trust me
Assume you love first before you get married.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propositional_calculus (if following the laws, the statements are 100% true)
Correct me if I'm wrong.

Using Modus Tollens

If p then q; not q; therefore not p
p=love
q=sign marriage certificate = officially married (true statement)

If love then sign marriage certificate
Not sign marriage certificate
Therefore Not love

if you don't sign your marriage contract, you're not in love
or you need to sign the marriage certificate, then you're in love,
and before you sign your love isn't real.
This is all true and proven below

You scratching your head? keep reading.


The above statement is true if love = exist. If it doesn't, we can make it exist using negation of not p)

So we have assumed 2 scenarios where there is love, and there isn't.
q =true, so we have to make p= true for the 2 scenarios
p=love
If you believe love is real is true, then don't marry (no benefit) - q=love is true. So 100% true

Using p is equivalent to the negation of not p
p=love is true. Is eqv to p=" love isn't true" is true

If you believe "love isn't true" then marry.
(for gains, or you think it might work out, divorce helps your scam live longer)

conclusion;

If you believe you need to love before you marry
Whether love is real or not real,
Marriage only benefits those who marry without love for each other (or one-sided)
If you're in both in love, don't marry, there are no REAL benefits. Only costing money.

Therefore Abolish Marriage law because it's useless (+ fixes gay marriage, no divorces)

Historically marriage began as social convention which allowed for the inheritance of property, namely land ownership. Tracing it's development, it began as something entirely separate from love and many marriages were arranged to aquire a political/socioeconomic 'advantage'. The modern notion of marriage being 'the crystalise of love' find it's roots in propaganda championed by pop culture, religion, and by various corporate agendas (especially by the diamond and film industry). As divorce rates continue to skyrocket nationally one begins to question the efficacy of such a dynamic and the influence it exerts on children (Every single person on both my mother and father's side of the family has gotten a divorce, including my parents). Do I still believe in love? Yes. Do I believe people belong together forever? No. All things are in state of transformation and relationships must eventually dissipate. To force their unity only produces grief, dissimumaltion, and insincerity.

So my true questions: How do we move forward, how are the children of future generations going to be raised, what does love mean in contemporary society?