Search Results: sexual harassment

Personally if i ran my own company, unless i was running a brothel, I'd never hire women if i could, unless it was low skilled easily replaceable workers like cleaners and secretaries and stuff, and even then I'd be very selective to avoid young and attractive ones. And all of that would be completely down to wanting to make a profit.
Enough maternity leave and sexual harassment claims is enough to sink that ship, so it's just not worth it, and that's not even including the differences in productivity that male and male, male and female, and female and female employees provide.

Since i read an article a few years ago from a female entrepreneur who went bankrupt from her female only company that sunk, claiming if she did it over she would have only hired men in hindsight
( https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1168182/Catfights-handbags-tears-toilets-When-producer-launched-women-TV-company-thought-shed-kissed-goodbye-conflict-.html ),
then i'm curious how much those thoughts are reflected in the rest of the population, particularly when it comes to men and women.

How'd you run your company?

imagine this situation: a man gets into an argument with a colleague. She falsely accuses him of sexual harassment and he gets angry and calls her a c**t. He gets fired because of the sexual harrassment allegations. He later proves it, but she is not fired. They give her a second chance and refuse to rehire him because he called her a c**t.

Is this unfair?

The Trump administration released new guidelines Wednesday for how universities and K-12 schools should handle complaints of sexual assault and misconduct as part of a contentious overhaul that Education Secretary Betsy DeVos launched in 2017.

Now, under reworked federal rules, alleged student perpetrators will have added protections, including the presumption that they are innocent throughout the disciplinary process and the right to be provided all evidence collected against them. Those students can also cross-examine their accusers and vice versa during live hearings, although it must be done through a lawyer or representative.

Under the Obama administration, the definition of sexual harassment was less specific — described as "unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature."

But the meaning has become narrower, using the Supreme Court's definition of harassment. The misconduct must fall under certain categories, including unwelcome conduct that is "so severe, pervasive and objectively offensive" that it "denies a person equal access to the school's education program or activity."

The way i see it, the current rules suck, all a woman... and yes its only women in college that have this power.. All a women need do is make the accusation. She needs no evidence, she needs no proof, no witnesses, nothing, and the accused is expelled from school. The most evil part of this, there were stories about a man who was passed out drunk, and he woke up to a girl having sex with him, he made a report, and was expelled, because the girls report had more merit even though he had witnesses and the like.. There are literally thousands of law suites against these schools because they failed to obey due process.. I see this as a welcome change.

As always attached is a direct link to the new rules going into effect August 12th.
https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/titleix-regs-unofficial.pdf