Search Results: sex with a taller girl

I have a problem. I want to be noticeably taller, bigger and more muscular than my ideal girlfriend, and by extension, I want my ideal girlfriend to be considerably shorter, smaller and slimmer than me. A lot taller than her, enough to rub the underside of my chin against the top of her head when I hold her close to me, and broader than her, as well as a lot heavier and stronger than her, to the extent where I can princess-carry her around or carry her over my shoulder. Those are the things I dream about, the imagined images which turn me on the most of all. I NEED to feel powerful, dominant- if I can't, then I can't be aroused. Trouble is, I'm only 5'7" tall. With the circumferences of my shoulders, chest, waist, hips and thighs measuring in at only 41", 35", 29.5", 31.5" and 19.5" respectively (shoulder width= 17.5") And while I can comfortably lift, walk around with and climb flights of stairs carrying weights considerably heavier than myself, and I have chiselled, well-defined abs, pecs and muscles everywhere, I still only weigh in at a meagre 120lbs (54kg).

Which means that, to meet my ideal criteria, to stand any chance of doing these things with her and to be taller, bigger and muscular enough in comparison to her for me to be aroused by the mental imagery of having sex with her, in the real world, she'd have to be 4'11" or shorter, and under 95lbs (43kg), with a waist slimmer than my own (27" or less). Her bust, hips and thighs don't matter all that much to me, but even so, do I have any chance of ever finding any girl (over the age of 16) who's small and slim enough to fit within these size parameters, here in the UK, where landwhales seem to be the norm these days? Or any chance of her being the slightest bit attracted to me, given how short, lightweight and slender I am? Or should I give up; are my desired measurements for my ideal girl too strict and unreasonable?

Men will sleep with any willing woman, but most women are pickier when it comes to sex and by pickier i dont mean only choosing the hottest and best men no, sure it happens sometimes but i meant that from my own observations it seems that women are more likely to have sex with a man who is a bad boyfriend, good for some quick fun but bad for anything long term , and here comes my question...

If a man is smart, funny, good looking, tall, nice and takes care of himself are most women going to view him as boyfriend material and do their best to be good in his presence so they are no labeled as bad girlfriend material? and of course they are going to avoid sex since easy girls are a no go for most decent guys.

Girls, if you could, would you kill or sterilize all unattractive and average men? Either choice will leave you only with attractive guys to have sex with. You won't have to be asked out by ugly and average guys anymore. Only 7/10+ tall, fit, facially attractive guys.

If you just kill us, then you won't even have to look at us and be disgusted by our appearance. On the other hand, if you sterilize us, you can make us your slaves (husbands) and you won't have to work anymore.

Average and ugly guys already have no rights when it comes to dating and sex. Most of us are kissless, hugless, handholdless virgins. Why make us suffer any longer?