Search Results: no sex in marriage

After all, according to Christianity, Jesus is 'The Son of God'- and not just spiritually, philosophically or 'in a manner of speaking' either- the whole faith revolves around the notion that God directly, personally, and physically, impregnated the Virgin Mary with the baby Jesus, knocking her up with his child. And the fact of the matter is that, when he's supposed to have done so, and engaged in his little baby-making session with the Virgin Mary- shortly after her betrothal to Joseph, but before the consummation of their marriage, in accordance with ancient Jewish custom- Mary could have been as young as 12, and would have definitely been no older than 14. As such, since their God supposedly had sex with (raped in her sleep really, since her consent was never asked for, and she was only informed second-hand by an angel the next morning, telling her to "Rejoice, for last night you were impregnated by God's seed, and will soon bear his son!"), and impregnated, a 12-14yo girl- well then, wouldn't that canonically make the God of Christianity a pedophilic child-rapist, since he explicitly raped the 12-14yo Mary in her sleep to conceive Jesus Christ? Wouldn't that make Jesus the product of pedophilic rape?

Am I overthinking this? After all, the legal age of consent's 16 here, so it should be alright, right? There shouldn't really be anything wrong with it, not from a legal perspective anyway. And I'd be orchestrating this in the youngest locality in the UK (Slough), one which doesn't have a university any more, no more clubs or bars- there's literally nowhere in town for young people like us to socialize. But still, I dunno; of course, to avoid any potential liability issues, it'd be safer to go with '18-25', and leave it at that. But the thing is that, like I said, the university which used to be in our town relocated more than a decade ago now; and the overwhelming majority of single girls in town who're even remotely attractive, and possess the slightest bit of intelligence, are sixth-formers or college students, in the 16-18 age range. And without them, I know full well from the few singles events and single groups I've given a try in this town that it'd be a total sausage-fest- there's very little chance it'd be successful without "lowering the bar", so to speak. So, what d'you reckon? Should I go with the '16-25' age range? The '18-25 (or 18-29)' age range? Or just abandon the notion of orchestrating a dating event (or several) entirely, and just do what every other Indian guy here (who doesn't want to get involved in the criminal sex trafficking rings, that is) winds up doing if they're single for long enough- i. e, cave into to the pressure, and accept my fate, along with the arranged marriage my family's oh-so-desperate to line up for me?

My friend said he ain't ever getting married unless he finds a submissive women who will cook, clean, suck dick and be a women. I said to him. Don't that mean u gotta provide like super hero if u want her to be happy. He says no. He wants control his relationship. Other wise she will control me with sex he says. How so u said. He says if a women married u for love she will do anything for u. But if she marries u for security the u in trouble. That means she just wanted to leave him n find a safe man that can help her not that she wanted love but just provider. He says Marriage is a fraudulent institution build by women to control men. Why would any men agree to stay with one women rest of his life. When men never date 1 women rest of their life.