Search Results: side bangs

https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/seuforum/bb_whatpowered.htm

Obviously if the Big Bang gave birth to all of existence, then matter and energy couldn't have existed and thus had a beginning too. So to assert that matter and energy is eternal is dishonest, especially considering scientists should know better and thus can't claim ignorance.

If there is no time and no space, then where is no when and no where for there to have the matter and the energy. It must have been an act of God to create matter and energy and no, this is not special pleading for God. I thoroughly explained how God's existence can't be preceded with an existence as that would make things co-existent with God and thus make the Biblical proclamation of Him creating all things. Time and space is a thing and God created it. This is shown in many facets how it can apply if true and thus is not special pleading.

Please explain why people claim matter and energy to be eternal when the Big Bang obviously isn't eternal! Before the Big Bang, there would be no time or space for the matter and energy to exist in since matter and energy would be an emergent property of the universe.

As a side note. I want to make it crystal clear to all here. When I say science seeker, I am talking about those who virtually thinks science is the only method to find and seek truth and is thus your spirituality. Spirituality is the search for truth. Religion towards the truth is dependent on whether you feel obligated to serve aspects of it. In science, if you hold methods more fond to where it affects who you are or how you live, then science can be your religion in addiction to your spirituality. It must be a spirituality to you if you seek it but it can or can not be a religion to you. It depends on how you adhere to certain aspects of it. Just wanted to clear that up.

Once upon a time I felt guilty about “hook ups” in my late teens and early 20s. Back then I actually had a few girls hop on me. I would follow up with them later to just hang out, just to be “nice”. Other guys would say “wtf you doing? You got your half”. Surprisingly there are some women who use men for sex. It’s much less insulting on male side when this happens. It does leave a bit of a hollow feeling though.

I also acted chivalrous and “took things slow” with the girls I really liked. That got me friendzoned 100% of the time. Every single time.

I’m my late 20s I just started banging everything in site. I have had three relationships in last 8 years. (From 8 months to a year long). Every single one these relationships we had sex within the first 3 dates.

When it comes down to it I WANT to take things slow and get to know a woman for who she is before sex. I could even wait to marriage for the right woman. But does that kind of woman only exist in the strict religious sectors? I’m spiritual myself but I’ve never found a woman I was crazy about in church. Please no rude atheist remarks to that observation. thanks.

But again I’m I guaranteed to get friend zoned EVERY time I try to take things slow? Nothing worse than putting in all that effort and anticipation just to be ditched for being too chivalrous and boring.

Like... endless friends with benefits questions, "what does this message mean after hooking up with this drunk guy in a bar", endless relationship problems", do I look hot?, fake profiles baiting people to scam them, "why does this guy I banged not message me, am I just a side fling", "I like this girl but how do I talk to her", blah blah blah...

Like... ugh...

I think I need to start drinking, maybe that will help?