Search Results: believe in signs

https://www.cnn.com/2017/08/04/health/exorcism-doctor/index.html

Richard Gallagher is a scientist from a great Ivy League college in New York at Columbia University. He even sees the realness to exorcisms and demon possession.

Why do you think this is scoffed at by so many science seekers? Do you think it just troubles them and hate the idea that demons may be real?

So many people in the high science fields don't believe in demons. I think at least report it was 93% of scientists think demons don't exist and 98% of scientists believe in evolution.

If true that only 7% of scientists believe demons are real and pose a threat to humans, will this hinder their judgment at being compassionate for those truly possessed by a demon?

Please share why you think so many science seekers don't take demon possession seriously and rule it out without looking into it. As scientists, they aren't suppose to drop a hypothesis until there is clear signs it is false. However, many of them are biased and do. Do you think this is just that they have harden hearts as science seekers and don't want it to be true?